Denis Villeneuve is aiming to bring Rendezvous with Rama to the big screen and its exciting, the sci fi masterpiece by Arthur C Clarke in his hands could be something special, plus rumors of him involved with Bond 26 makes this a busy time for the director, sci fi fans have a lot to look forward to, Villeneuve knows how to handle big concepts Read More in ➡️ #linkincomments
2/🧵The main reason why people go into business is to make profit. The goal of every businessman or businesswoman is to make profit; nobody will go into a business without profit. As someone who has been into business for some time now, I believe that business is more than buying and selling; it is about the way we communicate with our customers and the way we treat them. As a businessman or businesswoman, it is very important to strike a balance; good ethics can really bring long-term profit.
3/🧵do you think that business should prioritize ethnics and profit when running an operation? Is there anyway to strike a balance between the two. i will be glad to read your thoughts on this post below is link to my post.
Sorry that the price feed for @thebbhproject witness is not updating. WE are working on it the best we can. Seems to be a Ddos attack. Good news is the witness is working fine.
#bbh
Yay! New proud owner of 100 $LSTR shares !
Thanks to the posts by @onealfa , @taskmaster and @khaleelkazi for being really clarifying about the project 😎
Interstellar got a fresh boost on Netflix and its catching new eyes, Nolan classic is finding a new audience with its mix of emotional story and space epic, perfect for those who missed it first time around or want to revisit the mind bending journey through space and time, streaming really gives movies a second life sometimes Read More in ➡️ #linkincomments
Starting tonight/tmrw, you'll be able to track the buybacks and growth of POL in real-time
Take note of it right now: it starts at 1,000. The LeoDex affiliate revenue have already started buying back LEO. The bought LEO will now get deployed to Protocol Owned LEO
This is the display on the new /leo page on LeoDex where you can see the total sLEO held by POL and the current daily yield its earning + the daily buybacks of LEO it conducts using the USDC yield it gets
Your face. Their data. A viral concert 'joke.' The Coldplay Kiss Cam isn't funny, it's terrifying. I explain why this incident shows exactly why you need to care about decentralization NOW. Stop being the product.
Pedro Pascal talks about The Last of Us Emmys and its clear the guy is passionate about the project, proud of how far the show has come and the love from the fans, his energy shows why Pascal is becoming a go to guy for TV roles, The Last of Us is in good hands for future seasons, Pedro really gets what makes this story special Read More in ➡️ #linkincomments
You guys driving me crazy. I was trying to accumulate LSTR slowly and you are saying the price of it also going up. It seem before that happen I need to buy some LSTR.
I just saw the movie Superman 2025. It left me with mixed feelings. On the one hand, it's very naa, but on the other, I'm very happy that it's returning to the big screen with what looks like a new saga.
#movies #hollywood
Predicted the market cap for $LEO in my recent publication. Have a look to it in the thread next to this thread. It is realistic target with comparisons with rivals.
Just asked Gemini AI to analyze the last 7 days of HIVE/USDT candles 📊
Got forecasts for the next 4H and next 1D candles based on the trend.
Let’s see how close it gets 👀
When THORChain aligns with the defined self-executing criteria, it wouldn't need registration and would be classified as a decentralized commodity under the CLARITY Act. This places it under the CFTC's jurisdiction rather than the SEC.
🧾 Practical Implications:
• The CFTC would oversee futures and derivatives related to RUNE.
• The SEC's oversight on secondary trading would only apply in cases of fraud.
• RUNE could be traded on regulated digital commodity exchanges.
ton of King Crimson albums including Thrak... Opeth, ac/DC, pink Floyd the wall, steely Dan Aja, frank zappa... Ton of great stuff that's really hard to find
Purchasing groceries felt like shorting Bitcoin. Waiting another year to eat might have saved 50% on food costs. Surviving means effectively being short on Bitcoin.
Selling possessions like clothes, cars, and houses seems inevitable. Deflationary money poses challenges, as people might end up living in boxes and without clothes to accumulate more sats.
Possibility of tokenizing a stake to play in a poker tournament with cake sharing 50% of winnings if placed with stakers for $250 to $1,000 entry with addon and rebuy options at a crypto related event early next month.
Good morning. I just woke up and today I slept a little bit more. It's because yesterday I was very tired and exhausted. The weather seems a little bit warm and it looks like the temperature will increase which I don't like. I have a lot of task to do for today. What about you?
Again got 5+ $LEO. 6.5 LEO price at the current moment is very cheap but in the future the price will be more than 10X. So, I am holding it. And that's the power of micro earning.
I used to receive more than 2.5 $LEO for delegating HP to @leo.voter, but today I received only 1.57 LEO. Is it because of the increase in LEO price? I am asking because I am concerned about every $LEO.
I believe this is an alt account owned by coininstant. Not a fan of using the "inleo.voter" handle as a means to tricking people. Hopefully this isn't ill-gotten LEO. I haven't looked into it yet
Regardless, they're out of LEO now on all their alt accounts it seems.
These are the folks I mean when I say look to the richlist and encourage the haters/paper hands to dump
Best to get them out of the community before we launch what's coming ;)
At least they should us the name leo.voter to make it more convincing😅. I also can understand it.
If they sell, we are there to buy. So there is noting to worry. A lot of people are ready for it.
I'm very happy to see this btw. Very important we get these people to sell their LEO to the SIRP so we can remove it from unproductive hands and back into the System Income Rewards Pool buybacks
Unproductive -> Productive
This is a very healthy economic transition which is why I keep posting and saying to call out potential dumpers on the richlist. The earlier, the better
Creating a portfolio that supports and enhances one's lifestyle. The stock market offers a path to financial freedom—how do others plan to achieve theirs?
Yeah, or wash trading. Like you said, it's odd though, I'd understand it better if it was on LeoDEX so that they'd be farming the airdrop while creating volume that way.
Creating a dividend portfolio is akin to planting a tree that continuously yields profits in your garden. It's essential to provide the right care and nutrients initially to ensure its growth.
Investing in dividend stocks weekly is a way to give oneself a raise, avoiding dependence on external salary increases. Those who share this mindset tend to succeed financially.
Claiming "this is how life is" might be society's most common excuse. Take charge and create your desired life. Avoid the mindset that life’s challenges must be passively accepted.
Life’s underrated advice: It’s never too late. Each day offers a fresh perspective and the chance to change. Reinventing your life is always possible. "Too late" is an illusion. When you believe it’s too late, it’s often still early.
The hard reality is that success often resembles prolonged periods of setbacks before it all aligns, and then it's a return to the effort required to maintain that success.
Posting frequently each day doesn't guarantee growth. What matters is delivering content that resonates. Focus on creating value and reducing distractions.
Thanks! I make crypto and blockchain content—tutorials, market analysis, and web3 trends. Took me about 3 years of consistent posting to get here. It’s been a grind but totally worth it!
I know which will happen last. XRP going 10 dollars is going to take place after a long time. SUI can reach 10 dollars Eth also might not reach 10k in this cycle
I get why you'd think XRP will lag—it's got a tough road with regulatory stuff. But I reckon SUI might surprise us and hit $10 first if it keeps gaining traction. ETH at $10k feels like a stretch this cycle too.
Haha, I get it, LEO deserves some love! Maybe I’ll toss it in next time. For now, I’m sticking with ETH, XRP, and SUI. Which of these three do you think hits $10 first?
anyone interested in buying my entire Rising Star NFT collection? will let go cheap, don't feel like trying to list and sell one by one. 309 cards total. #risingstar
The ideal time to take profits is when the general public starts to experience FOMO and rush back into crypto. That's the clearest indicator of a market peak.
Reflections on zk advancements show incredible progress. Just two years ago, zk technology was mostly theoretical, with a widespread belief that it would take over five years to become practical for developers.
Check out ZKsync's implementation of zk messaging for secure, private comms on their platform. Here's a link to their docs for more details: https://docs.zksync.io. It's a solid real-world use case in production!
With foundational model creators making significant strides in model quality on generic silicon, it's time to leverage these models to create their own specialized silicon tailored for specific use cases.
Certain constraints are essential for this endeavor. Maintaining effective designs at non-advanced process nodes is crucial to avoid supply issues or yield problems and not challenge electron-level physics.
Cooling also plays a role. Efforts with a talented engineer on a CO2 chilled heat pump suggest that if successful, racks, systems, and chips could adopt this approach to lessen constraints.
Therefore, in five years, there will likely be significant growth and diversification in silicon. Expect numerous announcements about new chips starting with pre-training before shifting to inference.
A quoted statement mentions: over a million GPUs will be online by year-end! There's pride in the team's achievement, but the challenge is figuring out how to increase that by 100 times.
Various tools exist for writing specifications, building features, and fixing bugs, but they often function independently without integration. This can lead to code divergence or spec changes, resulting in inefficiencies.
Humans are greedy, untrustable bastards. All of them. No matter if it is a single person, or a group of humans binded "with a multisig cryptographic contracts". No matter how good looks their past "track record".
They will break all their own past promises and rip you off badly, once it becomes profitable for them. Unless they can't. Unless they have to REWIND the whole blockchain.
There is no single human on this planet, which I trust more than an open source blockchain algorithm.
(Big one, I mean. Bitcoin.
Not some random shitcoin.)
Humans are weak. Humans are flawed and vulnerable. All of them. Hence - the wars, crime, and all the other evil on this planet.
I agree with you 100%, humans are not trustable and they do what benefits them irrespective of what they promise or what they said before. No morals, no ethics nothing works once they are greedy.
Decentralized Governance with Smart Voting is the best option in my opinion where a proposal can be made and a treasury can be made. It is still not foolproof totally but better compared to a multisignature wallet where 4-5 people can come at one state to take decisions.
That's a very strong and unflinching perspective, and it certainly gives one pause for thought. The idea that humans are inherently flawed and driven by self-interest, to the point where even past promises and track records can be discarded for profit, is a sobering one. It highlights a deep skepticism about human nature and the systems we build.
Your trust in an open-source blockchain algorithm, like Bitcoin, over any human, speaks volumes about the desire for absolute transparency and unwavering rules. It suggests a longing for a system where trust is not placed in fallible individuals, but in immutable code that cannot be corrupted by human weakness or greed. The notion that global blockchains are the solution to human flaws and the resulting societal ills is a powerful vision.
It's a perspective that challenges us to consider where true reliability lies in a complex world. Thank you for sharing such a profound and thought-provoking viewpoint.
Yeah, exactly so. Like I love to say:
Code cannot be intimidated, bribed, convinced, seduced, blackmailed (unlike humans).
Code has no feelings, fears, greed, phobias, addictions (unlike humans)
Code is predictable. (unlike huimans)
Yes, but we were only rugged of the airdrop allocation. I'm actually on profit with Sonic and the with the LPs. Still, when a project does this its users, it's a warning sign and I'm going to move my assets to other chains and farms.
"After years of discarding the negative beliefs about myself that I had been taught and partly accepted, I finally learned to exist in the world with a sense of entitlement to my place in it."
The observation shared here isn't entirely accurate. Throughout global business experience, a notable cultural difference emerged: this question is particularly prevalent in the U.S., unlike many other regions.
If someone asks "what do you do?" shortly after meeting, don't get upset. Smile instead. You’ve identified a transactional individual. Respond with a low-status answer, then share your smartest insights during the conversation. This disrupts their expectations.
Effectivly - with 30m max supply + Strategy soft locking potentially millions of LEO, less and less leo determine market price (thus higher price) market cap will explode when strategy injects leveraged capital
we are a nano/micro cap project, not even a small cap right now. All the good things are happening at Leo but at the end of the day we all will have to accept this that global visibility is somewhat restricted when it comes to the market.
Someday or the other CEX listings will only help it get more visibility. One can disagree with me but I think that way.
I think that’s a very direct and honest assessment!
"The whole LEO marketcap is still a joke"
it certainly highlights the significant gap between potential and current reality, doesn’t it? Your comparison to 14 BTC really puts things into perspective.
It’s a journey, and sometimes, that journey can feel frustratingly slow. But perhaps, for those who believe in the long-term vision, these moments of undervaluation can also be seen as opportunities.
Exactly! One decent whale could literally vacuum up the whole market in a blink. LEO is still in its infancy… and people are sleeping on it. The joke today might just be the jackpot tomorrow.
welcome to inleo! and welcome to hive!
feel free to ask anything you want to know.
For starters you should edit your profile. Upload a profile image and a banner for your blog.
This platform is like X but better because you can do a nunch of stuff you can not do on X.
We answer all queries related to hive. Ask them in hivepakistan pak-help channel and someone will answer it. The only difference is, if u ask in urdu language, u will be asked too. Otherwise, there r many other people ways to ask your queries.
Ohh thanks for your help, currently i don't have this application in my phone but I'll make account here and ask for help when needed.
But is there rules for adding threads here?
Absolutely, oranges are a great way to kickstart your morning! Packed with vitamin C, they can boost your energy and immune system right from the get-go. Just don’t overdo it if your stomach’s sensitive to acidity. 🍊
Exactly, greed shifts your focus to the wrong priorities. It clouds judgment and pushes risky moves. Stay clear-headed, and the right decisions come naturally.
Art as a Reflection of War: From Ancient Civilizations to Modern Warfare
War and art have been intertwined throughout human history, serving as a means to communicate, commemorate, and critique conflicts. From the depictions of warfare in ancient civilizations like Assyria and Egypt to the complex expressions found in modernist movements of the 20th century, artists have continually sought to explore the multifaceted realities of war. This long narrative delves into how art has chronicled, responded to, and even influenced perceptions of war, especially during the tumultuous period of the First World War.
Ancient civilizations such as the Assyrians and Egyptians frequently illustrated war scenes, often for propagandistic purposes. Artistic works from these eras, like bas-reliefs decorating Roman arches, celebrated military triumphs and reinforced the power of leaders. For example, Roman reliefs depicting the sack of Jerusalem aimed to inspire awe among viewers and solidify political narratives. However, these representations largely ignored the human suffering of soldiers and civilians, focusing instead on victorious legacies and political claims.
Moving into the Renaissance, artists began to shift their focus. Jacques Callot, for instance, produced a series in the 17th century that vividly depicted the devastation of the Thirty Years’ War, illuminating the harsh realities of rural communities ravaged by conflict. Francisco Goya’s Disasters of War broke further from traditional glorification, portraying brutal atrocities committed during the Napoleonic Wars with raw honesty. The portraits of Antoine-Jean Gros, like those of Napoleon, even emphasized the emotional turmoil of the military leader rather than just military might.
The outbreak of the First World War marked a significant reorientation in how artists represented war. Instead of glorification, many works focused on the soldiers' perspectives and the physical and psychological destruction wrought by modern warfare.
William Orpen’s The Somme, a clear day, and Otto Dix’s series Der Krieg exemplify this shift, depicting soldiers and devastated landscapes with stark realism. Many artists serving as soldiers themselves brought authentic insights into these works, blending their artistic talents with personal trauma.
Concurrent with the horrors of war was the rise of Modernist art, which rejected traditional forms and realism. Artists like Picasso pioneered Cubism, and Italy’s Futurism emerged in 1909, celebrating technological progress and war’s chaos. British artists like Wyndham Lewis developed Vorticism, inspired in part by the abstract distortions of Cubism.
These avant-garde movements eagerly embraced war, especially after the Balkan Wars of 1912–1913, which fueled fascination with war’s destructive potential and technological innovations like airplanes and machine guns. Art reflected this excitement through fragmented, distorted imagery that symbolized the chaos and destruction of modern conflict.
Apart from depicting combat, art served functional military purposes. Camouflage, initially thought of as a means for concealment, was developed with complex geometric patterns designed to confuse enemy submarines and ships – exemplified by Britain’s dazzle ships project. Such visual techniques intended to distort target perception rather than hide vessels completely, using style elements like pointillism and swirling patterns.
Official war art also served as documentation. Britain established a War Artists scheme, with Muirhead Bone becoming the first official war artist in 1916. While some artists like Anna Airy remained on home soil, others painted frontline scenes. Germany, lacking an official program, had its own artists—such as George Grosz and Franz Marc—depicting the war’s impact, often showing wounded soldiers and barren landscapes.
Artistic Responses to War’s Horror
As the war dragged on, traditional artistic representations proved inadequate to convey the scale of devastation. The horrors—deafening noises, foul smells, relentless death—resisted capture by canvas alone. Artists responded with increasingly visceral, often disturbing imagery to evoke the emotional and sensory chaos experienced.
The post-war period saw a dramatic shift toward satire and protest. Paul Nash’s We are making a new world hinted at fractured hopes, while movements like Dadaism, beginning around 1915 in Zurich, expressed radical disillusionment. Dada artists rejected rationality and embraced absurdity, chaos, and the irrational, reflecting society’s loss of faith and a desire to rebuild from nothing.
The Aftermath and Continuing Legacy
The aftermath of the war left an indelible mark on art. Modernist movements, with their emphasis on abstraction, chaos, and often nihilism, shaped the trajectory of 20th-century art. Picasso’s Cubism and the surrealist outpourings captured war’s fractured reality in ways traditional art could not.
In addition, art played a vital role beyond artistic expression. It was used for propaganda, military deception, and recording history. Notably, Erich Maria Remarque’s All Quiet on the Western Front exemplifies literature as a powerful tool for anti-war sentiment, highlighting the profound psychological toll of combat.
War has continually challenged artists to depict the unrepresentable—its brutality, chaos, and human cost. From ancient conquests to modern warfare, art reflects society’s evolving perceptions, fears, and hopes. The First World War, in particular, marked a turning point—prompting a move away from glorification toward raw, honest portrayals and radical artistic experimentation. Understanding this history enriches our appreciation of how art both documents and influences the collective memory of war.
If you're interested in further exploring these themes, stay tuned for more insights into the profound relationship between art and conflict.
There was a dream about explaining cryptocurrency to others endlessly, with repeated questions popping up. It might have felt more like a nightmare, though the questions were still being answered.
The Tumultuous Week of World War I: Frontlines and Political Turmoil
Russia's Devastating Losses and the Retreat on Multiple Fronts
During this tumultuous week in World War I, Russia faced an almost catastrophic series of defeats that significantly weakened its position in the war. After months of retreating before the combined Austro-German offensive, the Russians lost several key territories, including the historic city of Warsaw, which they had held since the Napoleonic era. This loss struck a blow to Russian national pride—an acknowledgment of the relentless advance of Central Powers forces.
Most notably, the fortress of Kovno fell into German hands on August 17th after weeks of siege, symbolizing a severe blow to Russian military strength. Kovno was crucial not just strategically but also symbolically, representing Russia's military might. The Germans captured extensive artillery, weapons, and supplies—over 1,365 heavy guns and nearly 850,000 artillery shells. The Russian commander, General Grigoriev, fled without destroying key infrastructure such as rail tunnels and bridges, and faced immediate court-martial, sentenced to eight years of hard labor.
On the Eastern Front, the Russian army's collapse continued. By mid-August, pivotal battles at Brańsk and Novo-Georgievsk resulted in the surrender of tens of thousands of Russian soldiers, with some estimates citing 90,000 prisoners taken in the fall of Novo-Georgievsk alone. The rapid succession of defeats underscored the decline of Russian military effectiveness. The staggering number of prisoners—over 1.5 million by mid-August—reflected the disintegration of Russian resistance.
The Western Front: Trench Warfare and Mockery Amidst Hardship
While the Western Front was relatively "calm" compared to other theatres of war, the reality was far from peaceful. The back-and-forth nature of trench warfare persisted with continual attacks, counterattacks, and casualties. An illustrative story from the trenches, recounted by historian Martin Gilbert, sheds light on the soldiers' dark humor in the face of danger. Captain F. Hitchcock noted a German soldier’s leg protruding from a parapet he was ordered to remove—a macabre but telling example of the grim wit soldiers often employed to cope with their realities.
Meanwhile, on Gallipoli, British forces suffered setbacks due to strategic errors and fierce Turkish resistance led by Mustafa Kemal, who would later become Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. The Allies attempted to advance at Chunuk Bair but failed, highlighting the difficulties faced in the campaign.
The leadership of the Allies expressed frustration with poor coordination and training. British War Secretary Herbert Kitchener, irritated by the incompetence of commanders during the Gallipoli campaign, sent a scathing message to Winston Churchill, vowing to replace such ineffective leaders with "real fighters." The inadequate training of soldiers, many of whom had only learned trench warfare, led to embarrassing and costly failures. A perspective from Churchill’s brother, Jack, emphasized that these troops had little combat experience, only knowing how to fight in trenches and expect minimal progress of 90 meters before calling it a day.
At sea, the German Imperial Navy made several daring and controversial moves. On August 14th, German Zeppelins attacked the British coast, causing civilian casualties. German naval forces also targeted Riga, but Russian defenses compelled their withdrawal. The German U-boat U-27 engaged in attacks along the Baltics, but encountered unexpectedly well-prepared Russian ships, resulting in German losses.
One of the most infamous incidents involved the German U-boat U-35 and the destruction of the ship Nicosian, which was transporting mules from New Orleans to Britain. A British vessel, the Baralong, then appeared under an American flag to seize the cargo, and in a clandestine attack, the British forces killed several German sailors hiding on the Nicosian. The Germans protested, condemning the flag deception and the murders at sea—a reflection of the brutal and often illicit conduct of naval warfare.
Diplomatic Tensions, Espionage, and Submarine Warfare
The submarine warfare continued to escalate tensions. Germany's policy of unrestricted submarine warfare led to the sinking of passenger ships, exemplified by the torpedoing of the British steamer Arabia on August 19th, which resulted in 44 deaths, including Americans. Although Germany issued the "Arabic pledge"—promising to warn passenger ships before attacks to avoid civilian casualties—such promises were often broken.
The Germans also mounted naval operations against Russian ports, experiencing mixed results. In the Riga Gulf, German forces clashed with experienced Russian navies, losing ships in the process. Despite some success in landings, German naval gains in the Baltic remained limited compared to their continuous onslaught along the Eastern Front.
The Fall of Key Russian Fortresses and the Human Cost
One of the most significant defeats of the week was the fall of Kovno, the symbol of Russian resilience. Its surrender marked not just a major geopolitical loss but also a severe blow to Russian morale. The loss of thousands of artillery pieces and supplies, along with the retreat of General Grigoriev, epitomized the crumbling Russian war effort.
Further south, the fortress of Novo-Georgievsk capitulated on August 19th after heavy bombardment and a strategic crossing of rail lines. The loss of 90,000 Russian soldiers was devastating. These defeats contributed to the displacement of large numbers of prisoners—over 1.5 million—by mid-August, with Russian soldiers pouring into prisoner-of-war camps in Germany and Austria-Hungary.
Russian authorities faced mounting accusations of betrayal as the military's morale sank, and revolutionary ideas began to fester among the demoralized troops. The leadership was under intense scrutiny, and the disintegration of the front lines foreshadowed even greater chaos to come.
Broader Political Developments and International Alliances
Meanwhile, international diplomacy continued to unfold amidst the chaos. Italy declared war on the Ottoman Empire on August 20th, expanding the conflict into new theaters. This shift was part of the broader effort to weaken the Ottoman’s hold and to align Italy more firmly with the Allies.
The war's toll extended beyond Europe into the British Commonwealth and the United States. The United States, still neutral at this point, saw its ships targeted at sea as diplomatic tensions rose, especially after the sinking of the Arabic and the acts of deception involving naval vessels.
Reflection: War’s Grim Reality and Its Transformative Power
This week in World War I encapsulated the brutal, often tragic reality of the conflict. The Russians experienced a dire week of military defeats, revolutionary sentiments, and staggering prisoner numbers often exceeding 1.5 million. The Western Front, though relatively quieter, was marked by ongoing suffering and the soldiers' dark humor amid the trenches.
Naval warfare reached new lows of dishonor and violence, with underhanded tactics and sinking civilian ships causing international outrage. Meanwhile, strategic failures and leadership issues undermined the Allied efforts, especially in Gallipoli and the Balkans.
As the war dragged on, the optimism of early 1914 was replaced by despair, loss, and hints of revolution. Russia’s ongoing collapses and military setbacks foreshadowed the tumultuous changes coming to the world order—changes that would profoundly shape the 20th century.
Support and appreciation are directed toward angrysquirrel, whose enthusiasm and backing help keep the historical retellings alive. For more in-depth episodes and animated content, consider supporting on Patreon, and don’t forget to subscribe for weekly updates.
As we conclude this week’s overview, it’s clear that WWI was a conflict of immense human cost, strategic failures, and political upheavals—an era that would forever alter the course of history.
go wleo.io and choose arbleo enter the receiving adress your arb wallet adress and the amount click ok and enter your hive username when asked for. Sign transaction in keychain. Done
ARB $LEO is worth less but there is no way to trade arb leo against cacao which it is paired with... this will fix itself super soon once the pool is tradeable again...
The Future of Crypto Regulation in the U.S.: A Deep Dive into the Clarity Act and Recent Developments
In a significant breakthrough for the cryptocurrency sector, the U.S. House of Representatives recently approved three pivotal pieces of legislation that could reshape the landscape of digital assets. Among these, the Clarity Act emerges as the centerpiece, aiming to provide a comprehensive regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, while other laws like the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act and the Genius Act have also cleared important hurdles. As stablecoins gain official recognition and the legislative momentum builds, industry stakeholders and policymakers are watching closely to see how these laws will evolve in the Senate and what long-term impacts they might have.
This week has been dubbed “Crypto Week” by industry insiders, marked by the House of Representatives passing several crucial bills. The Clarity Act was approved with strong bipartisan support, underlining a shared desire to bring clarity and structure to the once ambiguous regulatory environment. Meanwhile, the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act, which seeks to limit the reach of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), was narrowly approved, reflecting ongoing concerns about privacy and government overreach.
The most notable legislative victory, however, is the passage of the Genius Act, the first federal law explicitly addressing stablecoins. This act is now on the President’s desk, awaiting his signature, signifying official recognition of stablecoins as a distinct legal category. These developments have shifted the focus to the Clarity Act, viewed as the most comprehensive and potentially transformative piece of legislation for the crypto industry.
The Clarity Act is designed to establish clear definitions and rules for digital assets, replacing the current patchwork of regulations that has often left industry participants in limbo. The legislation builds on prior proposals—including the FIT 21, the Lumis-Gillibrand proposal, the DCCPA, and the Securities Clarity Act—learning from their shortcomings and integrating their insights.
Key Elements of the Clarity Act
Definitions of Digital Assets: It introduces specific terminology such as digital assets, digital commodities, and adult blockchain systems. These categorizations are crucial for defining which regulatory agency oversees a particular token.
Regulatory Clear Lines: Tokens linked to centralized projects and classified as securities would remain under SEC oversight. In contrast, tokens associated with decentralized, mature blockchain systems would be regulated as commodities by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). This distinction aims to reduce the ongoing regulatory confusion.
Dynamic Categorization: Tokens can shift categories over time. For example, a project initially considered a security could, upon meeting certain maturity standards, transition to a commodity, thereby changing the applicable regulatory regime.
Framework for Stablecoins: The Act references the Genius Act to specify how stablecoins should be regulated. Depending on whether they are centralized or decentralized, stablecoins would fall under SEC or CFTC jurisdiction, respectively.
Restrictions and Protections: The bill proposes sell limits (e.g., $75 million over 12 months), provided there’s transparency, and aims to protect users from fraud—although the detailed rules are still subject to legislative refinement.
By establishing clear definitions and a tiered oversight mechanism, the Clarity Act endeavors to rectify the long-standing ambiguity—often leading to unpredictable enforcement, legal disputes, and hesitation among investors and entrepreneurs. It creates a pathway for tokens to evolve from securities to commodities, facilitating innovation while maintaining safeguards against misconduct.
Political Support and Opposition
The legislative process reflected a broad consensus within the House, with the Clarity Act passing narrowly with 294 votes in favor against 134. The anti-CBDC bill gained narrow approval as well, signaling cautious support for certain regulation types while opposing government-issued digital currencies due to privacy concerns.
However, the road ahead in the Senate is fraught with differing opinions. Republican senators like Lummis, Hagerty, and Tillis favor clearer regulatory roles for agencies, self-custody rights, and flexible rules for decentralized projects. Democrats, led by figures like Elizabeth Warren and Maxine Waters, are advocating for stronger consumer protections, anti-money laundering measures, and restrictions to prevent large tech companies from bypassing regulations through token issuance.
Notably, Waters has criticized the legislation, dubbing it a "cryptocurrency carnival" (or "Calamity Act"), warning of potential loopholes exploited by malicious actors. This divergence foreshadows a contentious debate in the coming weeks as the Senate considers amendments and clarifications.
The Legislative Outlook: When Will It Pass?
The legislative timetable is tight. With Congress preparing for recess in August and pressing budget discussions in September, lawmakers face a race against time to review, amend, and pass the bills. The current optimistic scenario suggests that the Senate might review the legislation in September, with a unified vote possibly occurring in the fourth quarter of the year, followed swiftly by the House.
However, there’s also a risk of delays—especially if disagreements over definitions, anti-CBDC provisions, or regulations around decentralized projects intensify. If delays occur, the process could extend into 2026, leaving the industry in limbo.
Potential Impact on the Cryptocurrency Market
The passage of the Clarity Act in its current or amended form could have long-lasting effects on the U.S. crypto industry. Short-term, markets might react with a rally, driven by increased regulatory certainty and institutional confidence. Longer-term, the legal clarity could pave the way for broader adoption, increased investment, and the emergence of a robust infrastructure for crypto transactions, custody, and compliance.
Moreover, clear definitions and frameworks would help curb the unpredictability that has hampered growth—ensuring that U.S.-based projects can operate under consistent rules, fostering innovation and job creation.
Internationally, the U.S. taking a leadership role in crypto regulation might influence other jurisdictions—prompting Europe and Asia to refine their policies to remain competitive in the global crypto race.
Conclusion: A Step Toward Regulatory Certainty
The recent legislative developments signal a turning point toward a more structured future for cryptocurrencies in the United States. While debate continues in the Senate and some provisions may be modified, the overall momentum suggests that comprehensive regulation is on the horizon.
If enacted, the Clarity Act promises to reduce the gray areas that have stifled growth and innovation, establishing a regulatory environment conducive to institutional participation and consumer protection alike. As the industry awaits the final vote, one thing is clear: the U.S. is moving closer to becoming the global crypto hub—provided these laws strike the right balance between regulation and innovation.
Stay tuned for updates as the Senate's debate unfolds, and for a detailed analysis once the legislation is finalized.
It’s that time of the month again , monthly subscription payment day! It’s always interesting to reflect on what services we choose to keep and which ones truly add value to our lives. In a world of endless subscriptions,
what are your must-haves that you happily pay for each month?
That’s a very interesting piece of information, and certainly something to consider! The fact that the $LEO supply is shrinking daily due to tokens being sent to @null indicates a deflationary mechanism at play. It suggests a controlled reduction in supply, which can have various implications for the token’s value over time.
This often stems from the man's lack of assertiveness, or occasionally, due to him being an inflexible, harsh dictator. Both feebleness and despotism are undesirable. Striking the right balance is something only a handful of men achieve.
Exploring French Weaponry During the First World War: An In-Depth Overview
The recent live session hosted by Indie Neidell, best known for his YouTube channel The Great War, delved into the fascinating world of early 20th-century firearm technology, focusing specifically on the French military armament at the outset of the First World War. Accompanied by social media expert Florian and firearms specialist Othais from Charleston, South Carolina, the discussion provided a comprehensive look at the evolution, design, and deployment of French rifles and pistols during this pivotal period.
Indie Neidell began by setting the stage, reminding viewers that World War I's outbreak in late July 1914 meant the French army was still heavily reliant on weapons developed in the late 19th century. Despite France's significant influence in military technology, much of their standard-issue equipment retained designs dating back two decades—specifically from the 1890s.
The key point emphasized was that armies at the time still primarily used bolt-action rifles, revolvers, and simple pistols. Although innovations such as repeating rifles and machine guns were advancing, most soldiers carried relatively basic weaponry when the war started, reflecting a mindset that often favored preparation from previous conflicts rather than the latest technology.
A cornerstone of French small arms during WWI was the Lebel M93, introduced in 1893 and notable for being the world's first rifle to use smokeless powder. The rifle's design was a product of 1886 and reflected the technological standards of its era.
Design and Length
The Lebel M93 featured a notably long barrel, which historians attribute to a military preference for high-precision shooting in traditional linear formations—an approach that persisted even as warfare transitioned into trench and semi-mechanized combat. Interestingly, the length was retained despite its impracticality in the semi-mechanized, movement-heavy battles of 1914.
Many questioned why the French maintained such a lengthy barrel, which made the weapon cumbersome for transport and handling on the battlefield. The conventional wisdom of the time suggested that a longer barrel conferred better accuracy; however, during WWI, it became evident that rapid, close-quarters combat rendered such features less critical.
The Lebel's most revolutionary aspect was its use of smokeless powder, which doubled the effective range and visibility on the battlefield. This advancement forced other nations to adapt rapidly, prompting a technological arms race. Yet, despite its cutting-edge nature at the time of its adoption, the Lebel had its flaws—such as a tubular magazine requiring manual reloading of individual cartridges and a lack of a safety mechanism.
The Lebel's tubular magazine, loaded with individual cartridges, stretched over four kilograms and posed logistical challenges in battle—requiring soldiers to carry multiple full magazines and reload under fire. This slow reloading process was particularly problematic, as it involved manually inserting each round, escalating the risk during intense combat.
The Berthier System
To improve upon this, the French introduced the Berthier rifle, a more practical design suited for frontline troops supporting rapid-fire needs. The Berthier used a detachable, streamlined magazine which significantly increased reload speed. It could load three rounds swiftly with a special loader, made possible by "dummy" cartridges that held no powder or primer, simplifying training and logistics.
Later modifications of the Berthier, such as the Model 92/96 and Model 1907, further enhanced magazine capacity and ergonomics. These rifles were lighter and more adaptable, reflecting a shift toward more efficient battlefield weaponry.
The Transition to Multi-Shot Rifles
Toward the later years of the conflict, French armaments continued to evolve by modifying existing rifles to fire more rounds rapidly.
From Three to Five Shots
The host demonstrated the process of upgrading a three-shot to a five-shot configuration, a significant innovation that brought the French rifle's firepower closer to German and British standards. This involved modifications to the magazine and internal mechanisms, with some parts being derived from earlier designs to streamline manufacturing.
One particularly thorny issue was the "crimped" cartridges, which enhanced sealing but complicated feeding and caused frequent jams due to dirt and debris on the battlefield. Moreover, during wartime, heat build-up became a concern—prompting the addition of handguards to prevent soldiers from burning their hands during sustained firing.
Comparisons with German and British Weaponry
The discussion touched upon French efforts to keep pace with German innovations, especially in machine guns and rapid-fire rifles. The Germans, known for their Mauser rifles and MG machine guns, achieved more advanced automatic and semi-automatic weaponry, often outpacing French designs.
French engineers attempted to match these capabilities by converting their bolt-action rifles into semi-automatic models and by improving magazine designs, although they faced limitations due to manufacturing capacity and battlefield conditions.
The Broader Implications of Weapon Design Choices
Throughout the session, Othais highlighted how these weapon systems—despite being state-of-the-art at the time—still reflected the military doctrine rooted in linear, close-order tactics. The design choices, such as excessive length or reliance on manual reloading, underscored a mindset that prioritized tradition over battlefield efficiency.
Many high-ranking officers, who often lacked hands-on experience with modern weaponry, accepted these outdated standards until the brutal realities of trench warfare exposed their deficiencies. This disconnect between design and combat realities influenced the overall casualty rates and tactical doctrines of the French army during WWI.
Conclusion: The Evolution Continues
Indie Neidell concluded by emphasizing that while the French did make significant strides with weapons like the Lebel and Berthier, the rapid technological developments during WWI often outpaced their existing arsenal. Future episodes will delve into German firearms, contrasting their innovations with the French and revealing the broader story of military technological progression during the Great War.
For enthusiasts interested in historical firearms, Othais’s detailed analysis and their ongoing series serve as invaluable resources, blending historical context with technical insights. Stay tuned for more episodes exploring the fascinating evolution of early 20th-century military weaponry.
A genuine individual operates on his own terms, even when acting selflessly and out of duty—it’s a deliberate choice, a conscious self-sacrifice for a greater purpose. Not subservient, but sovereign.
A woman cannot genuinely claim a man without giving herself completely to him. She might manipulate or benefit at his expense, but she won't genuinely capture his soul.
There are some regulations to follow if it isn't an investment. I don't know it all in details, but basically, to avoid being scrutinised by regulatory stuff, the APY/APR can't be displayed
There was a time when taking a break felt like losing progress. However, every return from a pause brought greater clarity, renewed energy, and a clearer path forward. Burnout obscures the best ideas. Stepping back can often be the wisest choice.
A Comprehensive Analysis of the Border Debate: Arguments for and Against Open Borders
The question of borders—who should be allowed into a country, when, and under what circumstances—has long been a contentious issue, sparking debates across political ideologies. In this detailed exploration, the author delves into the myriad arguments for and against open borders, critically examining their logical underpinnings, ethical considerations, and practical implications, primarily in the context of the United States but also applicable worldwide.
The video aims to clarify the common reasons cited by various factions—progressives, ethnonationalists, liberals, socialists, conservatives, and libertarians—to support or oppose open borders. By dissecting these arguments, the author hopes to distinguish between facts rooted in reality and fallacious or emotional reasoning, providing viewers with a nuanced understanding of the border debate.
One of the more emotionally charged, yet flawed, progressive arguments claims that because of European colonialism, much of the land in the U.S. is "stolen" from indigenous peoples, making the concept of "illegal" immigration hypocritical. The logic suggests that since the land was obtained through morally questionable means, labeling immigrants as illegal is unjust.
Critique:
The indigenous tribes did not homestead the entire land; their settlements occupied tiny fractions.
The claim that the land was "stolen" often ignores historical context, such as treaties like the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which sold California and other territories to the U.S. for $15 million—legally transferring ownership.
The argument of ancestral guilt is illogical: crimes are specific, with clear perpetrators and victims. Vague assertions of collective victimhood lack concrete proof.
Many proponents overlook that the land was largely unclaimed or unused at the time.
Ironically, this argument could imply that people from Europe or other regions could just as easily claim ownership of entire continents based on similar reasoning, revealing inconsistency.
Moral and Practical Implications:
Allowing "ancestral" claims to override current legal frameworks undermines property rights and could justify continuous land disputes rooted in vague victimhood.
Another common argument is that "white people" or natives own the land of a nation, and thus non-natives should be excluded or even expelled to preserve cultural and racial identity.
Critique:
Property rights depend on actual use or inheritance—not vague claims based on ethnicity or historical presence.
Claiming ownership of mountains or large territories without homesteading or clear inheritance is invalid.
Implementing ethnonationalist policies could lead to violent conflicts, large-scale expulsions, or even genocide—an ethically unacceptable outcome.
Practicing exclusion based on ethnicity overlooks the possibility of peaceful, voluntary communities formed through private property and free association.
Examples like South Africa’s Orania demonstrate that private communities can be established where groups can maintain cultural homogeneity without state force, emphasizing the importance of voluntary associations over coercive national policies.
Conclusion:
Such sweeping anti-immigration claims rest on shaky grounds, relying on verifiable ownership through use and work, not ethnicity or ancestral claims. The superior solution involves peaceful private community formation rather than violent exclusion.
Liberal and "Care/Harm" Arguments
Liberal proponents often argue that denying immigrants a better life is morally wrong, emphasizing compassion. However, this reasoning faces criticisms:
If it's immoral to deny aid or opportunity, why not extend this logic to private property? Why don't individuals have unlimited obligation to share their resources?
Private property rights are vital for social order; ignoring individual ownership leads to chaos.
The "welfare state plus open borders" combo leads to economic problems: influxes of non-contributing immigrants strain systems designed for citizens, risking insolvency and collapse.
Additionally, "freedom of association" is critical. Open borders can force people into communities they don't want to join, violating their ability to exclude incompatible cultures or beliefs—potentially creating low-trust, conflict-prone neighborhoods.
Morally, legitimate borders exist to protect property rights and social harmony; unqualified open borders risk undermining these foundations and inviting societal discord.
Socialist Perspectives and Their Contradictions
Socialist arguments for open borders often stem from strategic motives:
Importing low-income or uneducated populations may increase the voter base for socialism, thus advancing socialist policies.
However, empirical evidence from Scandinavian countries and elsewhere shows that low-skilled migrants tend to draw more from welfare than they contribute economically, leading to fiscal strain.
Therefore, open borders paired with generous welfare could precipitate economic collapse—an outcome unexpected and unwelcome by socialists who aim to expand social programs.
Some less dogmatic socialists oppose open borders, recognizing that mass migration can threaten social cohesion and economic stability.
Key Point:
Efforts to promote free movement for strategic gains are contradicted by economic realities where unchecked migration erodes the sustainability of welfare and social support systems.
Conservative "Country-First" Arguments
Conservatives often advocate for restricting immigration to prioritize national security, cultural integrity, and sovereignty:
Uncontrolled borders increase risks of terrorism, crime, and illegal activity.
Welfare states incentivize non-contributing migrants to enter, straining resources.
Cultural assimilation and social cohesion are threatened by diversity and lack of exclusion rights.
From a pragmatic perspective, focusing on internal stability and security is paramount.
Limitations:
While these arguments address practical concerns, they tend to ignore the philosophical basis for property rights and voluntary association, often relying solely on consequentialist reasoning that can overlook long-term societal benefits of controlled, yet open, migration.
The Libertarian Perspective: Two Main Arguments
Libertarians generally have a nuanced position, split mainly into two camps:
Open borders allow talented individuals to contribute optimally to global innovation.
For tech industries and scientific collaboration, free movement reduces inefficiencies, accelerates progress, and benefits humanity.
The argument is consequentialist, emphasizing economic growth and technological advancement.
2. The Moral/Ethical Argument
Since the state’s borders are illegitimate under libertarian philosophy—land is unowned until homesteaded or used—state borders are a coercive monopoly, and thus, there is a moral case for open borders.
Crossing unclaimed land doesn’t involve aggression; therefore, initiating or defending border enforcement is unjustified.
However, this position assumes that immigrants are not intent on exploiting the welfare system or voting to expand state power, which is often unrealistic in the current political landscape.
Critical Reflection:
Libertarian open borders would logically allow individuals, including libertarians, to freely move and settle without aggression if the land is unowned.
But, in a world of bordering states with welfare and democratic voting, open borders could enable undesirable outcomes—namely, influxes of communists or others who threaten property rights and liberty.
The author emphasizes that in reality, state borders are not simply unowned or contested land but are the result of legal and political constructs—a "monopoly" on land claims that justify coercion.
Because of this, a purely libertarian ideal of open borders conflicts with the actual functioning of modern democracies, where borders are tied to voting rights and public resources.
Immigration in the real world often translates into voting power and access to welfare programs, which can violate existing property rights and undermine social trust.
The logic that applying open borders in an ideal state aligns with libertarian principles breaks down when considering how the current system allows for redistribution of property rights through voting—a form of aggression under libertarian ethics.
For example, allowing communists or other anti-liberty voters to enter and then vote to confiscate property violates the foundational principle of private property.
The Irony and the Path Forward
The conclusion suggests that:
Strict open borders in the current political and economic environment effectively amount to inviting factions that will violate private property rights.
The optimal pragmatic policy, given current realities, is a controlled, screening-based immigration system that prefers libertarian-minded individuals—those unlikely to vote for destructive policies or exploit social welfare.
Possible policies include restricting entry to those with certain educational backgrounds, financial stability, and a demonstrated preference for liberty.
Final Thought:
The author advocates for a "least bad" approach: maintaining some level of selection and control to prevent property rights violations while fostering peaceful, voluntary communities. He emphasizes that "perfect" is the enemy of "better", urging libertarians to accept pragmatic improvements over idealized but unimplementable ideals.
The border debate intertwines ethical, practical, and philosophical considerations. While libertarian philosophy argues for the illegitimacy of state borders and promotes open borders in principle, the current political structure and societal realities compel a more nuanced approach—one that balances libertarian ideals with pragmatic policies to safeguard property rights, social stability, and individual liberty.
As the author notes, understanding these complexities is crucial for shaping policies that are as consistent and effective as possible, moving beyond naive abstractions toward solutions that respect human nature and the realities of governance.
An Objective Critique of ContraPoints and the Progressive Slippery Slope
In this detailed analysis, the author offers a critical perspective on the content and rhetorical strategies employed by popular progressive YouTuber ContraPoints. The focus centers on the recurring use of what the author calls the "progressive slippery slope" — a skewed argumentative tactic often employed in left-leaning discourse to demonize opposition by suggesting moderate positions inevitably lead to extremist or fascist outcomes.
ContraPoints: A Visual and Stylistic Content Creator
The author begins by acknowledging ContraPoints' popularity, not because of ideological agreement but due to her high-quality visual presentation and stagecraft. Despite this, they critique her for relying heavily on certain dishonest reasoning patterns, particularly the slippery slope fallacy, which the author views as a common and dangerous tool within the broader scope of progressive rhetoric.
ContraPoints, like many others in progressive circles, often avoids direct confrontation with criticism by conflating moderate viewpoints with dangerous extremism. This tactic effectively shields her side from meaningful debate because it redirects nuanced discussions into a "guilt-by-association" narrative.
The Progressive Slippery Slope: A Fallacious and Manipulative Strategy
The core problem identified is the frequent invocation of slippery slope arguments — claims that certain beliefs or policies, no matter how innocuous, will always lead to undesirable, often fascist, outcomes. The author describes the pattern as follows:
Begin with moderate or acceptable concepts (e.g., criticism, cultural preservation, some restrictions on immigration).
Present them as potentially dangerous by insinuating they are "questionable" or "questionably harmful."
Use vague or unsubstantiated connections to link these to extremism or bigotry.
Conclude that support for such moderate ideas tacitly endorses fascism or white supremacy.
This rhetorical pattern shifts the burden of proof away from the claimant, forcing critics to disprove a hypothetical and often unfalsifiable chain of events. The author asserts that these are fallacious arguments unless hard evidence demonstrates a logical progression from moderate to extreme viewpoints.
Case Studies: From Fascism to Trans Issues
Recognizing Fascism
Contrapoints' video on how to identify a fascist is examined. She claims fascists share specific beliefs, such as racial essentialism and hostility towards minorities. The author criticizes her for misdefining fascism — conflating it with white supremacy and neglecting the nuanced, historically-specific nature of fascist regimes.
She attempts to map a "slippery slope" from relatively benign nationalist or cultural views to full-blown fascism, but the author highlights the lack of concrete evidence supporting that such beliefs naturally or likely lead to fascism. Instead, she points out that many of her scary symbols and threats are merely cultural or meme-based signals, not indicators of an imminent totalitarian takeover.
The author emphasizes that statistical and evidential support are missing. For instance, he notes that figures like Richard Spencer or other alt-right personalities, despite their repugnant views, have minimal followings, undermining the implied "pipeline" from moderate conservatism to fascism.
In her critique of Joanne Rowling's comments on transgender issues, ContraPoints presents the controversy as part of a slippery slope leading to oppression and authoritarianism. The author counters that Rowling's concerns about trans women in sports are legitimate, rooted in physical realities, and not some covert bigotry.
He criticizes ContraPoints for avoiding mention of the specific issue of transgender athletes—arguably the most contentious aspect—arguing that her omission is a sign of strategic dishonesty. Instead, she engages in over-generalizations and conflates criticism with hate, further exemplifying the slippery slope tactic.
Another recurring element is how the author claims ContraPoints and others falsely equate genuine criticism with hate, thereby silencing dissent. This tactic involves:
Framing any questions or skepticism as "bigotry" or "transphobia."
Using broad, vague definitions of hate to dismiss any opposing views.
Employing kafka traps—where denial of guilt is presented as proof of guilt.
This method deters honest dialogue and propagates a "thought crime" mentality, making it impossible to discuss sensitive issues without being accused of malice or bigotry.
The Irony and Dangers of the Slippery Slope in Progressive Discourse
The author argues that this argumentative style leads to a paradoxical situation: support for leftist ideas becomes a litmus test for "antisocial" or extremist beliefs. Consequently, legitimate concerns—such as those about sports fairness or free speech—are dismissed outright as covert fascism, hampering nuanced debate.
He further claims this reasoning fosters authoritarian tendencies, with notions like "free speech is under attack" used as a weapon to shut down opposition rather than as a genuine concern. Such tactics, the author asserts, are dangerous because they can be employed to justify censorship, silence dissent, and shift the Overton window toward oppressive policies.
The critique extends into the larger political landscape. The author points out that far-left revolutionary rhetoric is often treated as unlikely or impossible by ContraPoints, while far-right revolutionaries are portrayed as inevitable and imminent. This asymmetry creates a biased narrative that exaggerates the danger of leftist ideas while downplaying the genuine threat posed by extremist groups on the right, such as militia movements.
He argues that this false dichotomy—which frames all alternatives to woke ideology as extremist or fascist—serves to entrench a form of ideological tyranny, where criticism is effectively criminalized.
The Better Alternative: Rational Discourse and Honest Evaluation
While critical of the slippery slope method, the author admits that ContraPoints' content sometimes does shed light on valid issues when she abandons this faulty reasoning. For instance, her nuanced take on envy recognizes that it is a human trait present across all societies, debunking simplistic left-right narratives about capitalism versus socialism.
He advocates for rational debate, grounded in empirical evidence rather than fear-mongering, and emphasizes the importance of free speech and objectivity. Instead of viewing political discourse as an unavoidable clash of opposing villains, he encourages seeing issues through a lens of truth versus falsehood and rational versus absurd.
In conclusion, the author aims to hone the reader's ability to detect the "progressive slippery slope" in action—a pattern of vague associations, fear-mongering, and ideological dogma designed to suppress debate and justify authoritarianism.
He emphasizes that honest criticism is vital for societal progress, and that disproportionate fears and unsubstantiated claims damage the very causes they supposedly champion. By understanding these tactics, viewers can foster more honest discussion and resist manipulation in political discourse.
This critique highlights the dangers of fallacious reasoning and manipulative rhetoric often seen in progressive content, especially with regards to fascism, transgender issues, capitalism, and free speech. It warns against accepting sweeping, unsubstantiated claims that threaten the foundations of rational debate and open discourse, advocating instead for a more evidence-based, nuanced approach to controversial topics.
Hana Network is an emerging project in the SocialFi and AI agent space, focused on building a decentralized attention layer for the internet. I prepared a smooth breakdown for crypto bros! #pob #bbh #slothbuzz
Why You Need More Money to Retire Than You Think: A Deep Dive into Inflation, Currency Manipulation, and Financial Planning
Retirement planning is a topic that often involves assumptions about future expenses, inflation rates, and investment returns. However, recent insights suggest that many people significantly underestimate how much money they’ll actually need. The core message? You’re going to need a lot more money than you think to retire comfortably, and understanding the manipulation of currency and inflation is crucial in accurately assessing that number.
The Manipulation of Interest Rates and Its Impact on National Debt
The discussion begins with a provocative statement from Donald Trump advocating for interest rates to drop to 1%, stating, “we’re paying 4% and that over a trillion dollars in interest.” While his comments are politically charged, they serve to highlight a fundamental issue: interest rates are manipulated by powerful entities such as the Federal Reserve.
The US government's current interest payments on its debt—approximate $1 trillion annually—are driven by the prevailing interest rates. When rates are high, debt servicing costs balloon, making borrowing more expensive. Conversely, lowering interest rates can temporarily ease the debt burden; however, it comes with long-term consequences. The key point here is that interest rates are not fixed and are subject to manipulation, which affects the value of the US dollar and the overall economy.
This manipulation is critical because it reveals how the US dollar—often considered “real money”—is actually a form of “fakey” or manipulated currency. With policymakers like Jerome Powell adjusting rates with a pen stroke, the future value of money becomes increasingly uncertain and susceptible to devaluation.
The Opposing Views: Federal Reserve vs. Political Leaders
A notable tension exists between the Federal Reserve’s goal to slowly decrease the dollar’s value to maintain economic stability and political figures like Trump, who prefer a rapid depreciation of the dollar.
The Federal Reserve's strategy involves keeping interest rates relatively high enough to discourage excessive borrowing, thereby preventing rapid inflation.
Trump’s approach, on the other hand, aims to drive rates down to promote borrowing, stimulate spending, and depreciate the dollar rapidly.
This clash demonstrates how currency value is continually being manipulated, influencing everything from inflation to asset prices.
The Consequences of Low-Interest Rates: Inflation and Savings Erosion
Lower interest rates incentivize borrowing but decrease the incentive to save. Bank accounts paying 3-4% interest will likely see those returns diminish as rates drop further, making cash holdings less attractive. More importantly, the value of money in savings diminishes over time because of the intentionally managed inflation.
Most people assume inflation is around 2%, but this figure is often deliberately understated. In reality, inflation can be significantly higher—potentially 11.5% or more—especially when considering the modern methodologies that modify the Consumer Price Index (CPI) to make inflation appear lower than it actually is.
Why does this matter? Because if inflation is underestimated, individuals will plan for far less than they actually need to cover future expenses.
Inflation: The Hidden Threat to Retirement Savings
Many mistakenly believe their expenses will only rise 2% per year. However, real-world data suggests otherwise—costs like housing, food, and healthcare are rising at much faster rates, sometimes exceeding 10%. For example:
Organic grass-fed beef prices have surged by about 60% in recent years.
General inflation for some goods can reach 20% annually.
This discrepancy means that your projected future expenses may be vastly underestimated, leaving you short of the funds needed for a comfortable retirement.
The Cost of Underestimating Inflation
Let’s consider a practical example:
If your current monthly expenses are $5,000, at 2% inflation, in 20 years, your expenses would be roughly $6,600.
At 5% inflation, that same cost would balloon to nearly $10,000 per month.
The difference is enormous. Underestimating inflation results in a massive shortfall because your savings may not grow fast enough to keep pace with rising costs.
The Investment Perspective: Stocks, Bitcoin, and Asset Strategies
Stocks historically deliver around 10% returns, comfortably beating 2% inflation. However, if inflation turns out to be higher than expected, the real return diminishes, reducing your purchasing power in retirement.
Bitcoin, in contrast, has demonstrated exceptional growth rates—with compound annual growth rates (CAGR) often surpassing 50% over the past several years. The argument here is that Bitcoin can outperform inflation and serve as an effective hedge for those planning for long-term retirement.
To retire comfortably, the suggested stock portfolio should be around 30-35 times annual expenses.
With Bitcoin, you may only need 10-15 times your annual expenses because of its higher growth potential.
This indicates that cryptocurrency holdings could be more efficient in building wealth for retirement compared to traditional stocks.
How Much Do You Need to Retire?
A common rule used is the “4% rule”, which suggests you withdraw 4% of your savings annually in retirement. However, this rule may no longer be sufficient in a high-inflation environment. A more conservative approach might be the “3% rule”, which entails accumulating more capital.
For example:
With stocks: To generate $81,000 annually at 4%, you’d need about $2 million.
With Bitcoin: Because of its higher growth potential, a portfolio of around $1 million could suffice, assuming the same level of expenses.
Furthermore, the ability to withdraw larger percentages—say 6% per year—becomes feasible with Bitcoin due to its rapid appreciation and compounding growth, which reduces the length of needed savings incubation.
The Real Cost of Mistakes: Underestimating Inflation
Overestimating or underestimating inflation can cause a difference of up to $10 million in savings needs today. If you assume 2% inflation but it’s actually 8-10%, you’ll discover in retirement that you’ve saved far less than necessary.
The bottom line is that the US dollar is not the safe haven or “real money” many assume it to be. Its value can be manipulated, leading to rapid devaluation if rates are lowered aggressively.
Your future expenses will likely be higher than your current estimates.
To retire successfully, you need much more money—potentially 3 to 5 times more than what conventional rules suggest.
An allocative approach incorporating Bitcoin could significantly reduce the amount of capital you need.
If you want to get a clearer picture based on your own situation, it’s advisable to run your own numbers or consult with a financial expert. The key is to plan for the worst and be prepared because the true inflation rate might be much higher—and the currency’s value much lower—than mainstream narratives suggest.
If you'd like personalized calculations or assistance with your retirement plan, consider booking a consultation. Don’t wait until it’s too late—start planning today with realistic assumptions.
Why Is Israel Protecting the Druze? Unraveling an Unlikely Alliance in the Middle East
On July 16th, Israeli jets launched strikes deep inside Syria, but not to target Iranian representatives or respond to rocket attacks. Instead, these airstrikes aimed to protect a vulnerable minority community—the Druze. This move surprised many, challenging conventional explanations for military intervention in the region. Why would Israel risk escalation and cross-border conflict to defend a community that does not even govern the territory it inhabits?
The answer lies in one of the most unexpected yet enduring relationships in the Middle East—an alliance rooted in history, pragmatism, and strategic necessity that stretches back to the early days of the Israeli state.
To understand this alliance, we need to examine who the Druze are and why Israel values their loyalty so highly. The Druze are a small, esoteric religious community of Arab origin, emerging in Egypt in the early 11th century. Combining elements of Shiite Islam with other faiths and philosophies—including reincarnation—they have historically faced persecution and suspicion from mainstream Muslim communities, which often regarded them as heretics.
Consequently, the Druze developed a tradition of secrecy, insularity, and pragmatic alliances, often residing in mountainous areas where they could defend themselves. Today, approximately 1.5 million Druze live worldwide, with the largest populations in Syria, Lebanon, and Israel.
In Syria, around 600,000 to 700,000 Druze mainly inhabit the Jabal al-Druze region near Suweida in the south. Most of these communities maintain a cautious distance from the Syrian conflict and the Israeli border, partly because of historical ties and partly due to mistrust of foreign involvement.
Lebanon’s Druze, under influential families like Jumblatt, have played vital political roles, often balancing relationships with neighboring powers like Syria, Hezbollah, and Western nations. Their engagements tend to fluctuate with Lebanon’s volatile political landscape.
In Israel, about 130,000 Druze reside mainly in the Golan Heights and Galilee. They serve as a vital part of the Israeli military and civil service, uniquely subject to conscription among Arab citizens. For Israel, the Druze are a reliable Arab minority that exemplifies integration, loyalty, and strategic partnership.
Historical Roots of the Israel-Druze Relationship
Israel’s relationship with the Druze dates back to 1956 when a military agreement allowed Druze men to serve voluntarily in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). Over time, the Druze became fully integrated into Israeli society, serving in various military roles—including high-ranking officers and generals—and holding political positions. Their service symbolizes loyalty and trust—traits highly valued by the Israeli state.
For the Druze, this partnership provides access to resources, political representation, and social mobility. Despite occasional internal dissatisfaction and claims of discrimination, the bond has remained strong, largely based on shared interests and mutual benefit.
The Regional Dimension: Allies Beyond Israel
Israel’s ties with the Druze extend beyond its borders, especially to Lebanon. The Lebanese Druze, led historically by influential families like Jumblatt, have sometimes aligned with Israel, especially in opposition to Syrian influence and Hezbollah. During Lebanon’s civil war, Druze factions occasionally collaborated with Israel against common enemies, although these alliances were often fragile and driven by shifting interests.
In Syria, relations are more complex. While most Druze communities have longstanding ties to Syria and identify primarily as Syrian, some groups in the Golan Heights—occupied by Israel since 1967—have resisted integration or citizenship, viewing themselves as Syrian. During the civil war, some Druze in Syria maintained neutrality, while others supported the Assad regime to ensure their safety.
The 2025 Conflict and Israel’s Intervention
In July 2025, violence erupted in Syria’s Suweida province—home to a significant Druze population—following a violent clash involving Druze tribes and Bedouin tribes. The conflict intensified rapidly, threatening a potential massacre and destabilization of the region.
In response, Israel launched a series of airstrikes not only targeting Syrian military positions but also seeking to contain the violence and prevent Druze communities from suffering violence or displacement. Israel justified its strikes as a humanitarian measure to prevent a broader regional catastrophe.
Syria condemned the incursions as violations of sovereignty and escalations, while Israel argued it was acting in self-defense—and, crucially, in defense of the Druze community. A temporary ceasefire mediated by the U.S. and Arab countries saw some troop withdrawals, but violence persisted, and the region remains tense.
The Israeli strikes are driven by multiple factors. Strategically, Israel aims to prevent Iranian-backed militias and other hostile forces from establishing footholds near the Golan Heights. The Druze serve as a buffer, given their hostility towards radical Islamist groups and mutual suspicion of the Syrian government.
Politically and symbolically, the intervention signals to Israel’s Druze citizens that their loyalty is recognized and valued, especially during domestic debates about minority rights and militarization. It reinforces the idea that Israel will stand by its Arab minority allies—both to bolster internal unity and to project strength outward.
However, this alliance is not without risks. For the Druze, prolonged association with Israel could increase vulnerability within their communities, especially as some members question the benefits of their loyalty, citing discrimination and marginalization inside Israel.
Furthermore, Israel’s military intervention in Syria might inadvertently entangle the Druze communities in broader regional conflicts, undermining their safety and independence. If the Druze are perceived as extensions of Israel, it could lead to greater hostility from other Middle Eastern actors.
The relationship’s future remains uncertain. Will the Druze continue to serve as a pragmatic buffer for Israel, or will internal divisions, regional rivalries, and shifting geopolitics challenge this partnership?
The Israeli protection of the Druze in Syria and the broader Middle East exemplifies a pragmatic alliance rooted in history, mutual strategic interests, and shared security concerns. It defies typical regional partnerships based on ideology or ethnicity, highlighting instead the importance of pragmatism and survival.
As tensions persist and regional dynamics evolve, this unlikely partnership will be tested. Regardless of its future, it remains one of the most distinctive and fascinating relationships in Middle Eastern geopolitics—an alliance built on necessity, history, and a shared understanding of the complexities of survival in an often hostile environment.
LEO token keep displaying signs of strength. Price currently at $0.059 price level. If this strength continues, we will sure by heading to $0.1 price level.
The devaluation of money might make basic needs like food seem like luxury items. To navigate this situation, focusing on investment in high-quality assets could be crucial.
Bitcoin seems overly complex. Instead, opting for a traditional bank account means providing ID, home address, and mother's maiden name, then waiting five days to get set up.
It's not possible to provide a list of specific accounts that visit profiles frequently, as this kind of information is usually not accessible or tracked in such detail.
Having experienced a hectic routine and then falling ill after some rest means discovering that cortisol boosts immunity temporarily. Gradually ease into relaxation from intense activities and keep your mornings active.
Denis Villeneuve is aiming to bring Rendezvous with Rama to the big screen and its exciting, the sci fi masterpiece by Arthur C Clarke in his hands could be something special, plus rumors of him involved with Bond 26 makes this a busy time for the director, sci fi fans have a lot to look forward to, Villeneuve knows how to handle big concepts Read More in ➡️ #linkincomments
#denisvilleneuve, #rendezvouswithrama, #arthurcclarke, #scifi, #bond26, #moviesonleo, #skiptvads
Read More: https://screenrant.com/denis-villeneuve-rendezvous-with-rama-sci-fi-movie-bond-26/
#skiptvads
If a movies is coming, I guess it's finally time for me to read the book. Gotta read the book before seeing the movie.
1/🧵do you think that business should prioritize ethnics and profit when running an operation? Is there anyway to strike a balance between the two.
#outreach #threadstorm
2/🧵The main reason why people go into business is to make profit. The goal of every businessman or businesswoman is to make profit; nobody will go into a business without profit. As someone who has been into business for some time now, I believe that business is more than buying and selling; it is about the way we communicate with our customers and the way we treat them. As a businessman or businesswoman, it is very important to strike a balance; good ethics can really bring long-term profit.
3/🧵do you think that business should prioritize ethnics and profit when running an operation? Is there anyway to strike a balance between the two. i will be glad to read your thoughts on this post below is link to my post.
#gosh
https://inleo.io/@cindynancy/balancing-ethnic-and-profit--4od?referral=cindynancy
Thank you for your witness vote!
Have a !BEER on me!
To Opt-Out of my witness beer program just comment STOP below
View or trade
BEER.Hey @cindynancy, here is a little bit of
BEERfrom @isnochys for you. Enjoy it!Learn how to earn FREE BEER each day by staking your
BEER.Sorry that the price feed for @thebbhproject witness is not updating. WE are working on it the best we can. Seems to be a Ddos attack. Good news is the witness is working fine.
#bbh
Yay! New proud owner of 100 $LSTR shares !
Thanks to the posts by @onealfa , @taskmaster and @khaleelkazi for being really clarifying about the project 😎
Absolute legend!
Haha you're too kind. I'm just a noisy fish but I hustle when possible!
100 $LSTR will be generational wealth someday 😆
Thanks for the vote of confidence! 🦁
🫡 Definitely feels like the right time to jump onboard
MUST WATCH!!! going to burn my eyes with it this weekend , Untamed
#skiptvads, #tvonleo, #streaming, #netflix
A very good price, it could reach 0.10$.
https://inleo.io/threads/view/mcoinz79/re-leothreads-hfsba9cs
I think it would do this very soon
That would be incredible, we just have to stay tuned.
Interstellar got a fresh boost on Netflix and its catching new eyes, Nolan classic is finding a new audience with its mix of emotional story and space epic, perfect for those who missed it first time around or want to revisit the mind bending journey through space and time, streaming really gives movies a second life sometimes Read More in ➡️ #linkincomments
#interstellar, #netflix, #nolan, #space, #streaming, #emotional, #moviesonleo, #skiptvads
Read More: https://movieweb.com/interstellar-christopher-nolan-sci-fi-streaming-netflix-hit/
#skiptvads
The POL section is now LIVE
LeoDex POL buybacks are about to heat up
Starting tonight/tmrw, you'll be able to track the buybacks and growth of POL in real-time
Take note of it right now: it starts at 1,000. The LeoDex affiliate revenue have already started buying back LEO. The bought LEO will now get deployed to Protocol Owned LEO
This is the display on the new /leo page on LeoDex where you can see the total sLEO held by POL and the current daily yield its earning + the daily buybacks of LEO it conducts using the USDC yield it gets
I looked and didnt see it on Leodex.
Can't see it either. 🤔
He said "tonight/tmrw" so it must today then.
staking live on arbitrum?
You guys work so fast. Do you rest at all?
Do it right. 😉
https://inleo.io/@wiseagent/the-appreciation-game-4vc
Big token bet eight days ago
https://inleo.io/threads/view/onealfa.leo/re-leothreads-2rymgrjvz
A Major Shift for Crypto Adoption in the Philippines: GrabPay Now Accepts Crypto!
#bbh #cent #pob
https://ecency.com/hive-188409/@logen9f/a-major-shift-for-crypto
Your face. Their data. A viral concert 'joke.' The Coldplay Kiss Cam isn't funny, it's terrifying. I explain why this incident shows exactly why you need to care about decentralization NOW. Stop being the product.
Pedro Pascal talks about The Last of Us Emmys and its clear the guy is passionate about the project, proud of how far the show has come and the love from the fans, his energy shows why Pascal is becoming a go to guy for TV roles, The Last of Us is in good hands for future seasons, Pedro really gets what makes this story special Read More in ➡️ #linkincomments
#pedropascal, #thelastofus, #emmys, #passionate, #hbo, #tvonleo, #skiptvads
Read More: https://collider.com/pedro-pascal-the-last-of-us-emmys/
#skiptvads
Too bad he's character was killed off in S2. A lot of gamers got mad when that happened in the game and it seems TV fans were not happy as well.
Good Morning
Local Time 6:45 AM
$BTC $ETH $DOGE $HIVE $HBD $RUNE $LEO
Absolute legend picked up 100 $LSTR
We’ve got some cool announcements coming 🤝
Grab your stake (while you can) at the sell wall price. LSTR is currently trading at a discount to net asset value
Likely won’t last long. As soon as it’s sold out, a pool will go live for LSTR:LEO which will trade higher than the sell wall
https://inleo.io/threads/view/renovatio/re-leothreads-mffbmnth
You guys driving me crazy. I was trying to accumulate LSTR slowly and you are saying the price of it also going up. It seem before that happen I need to buy some LSTR.
Haha price will go up as soon as the sell wall is gone :)
If you see the data on inflows via LeoDex and inflows to the SIRP, it is basically a certainty at this point
This is why I kind of laughed when Mitch was surprised by that statement. “If you see what I see” referred to the inflows of LeoDex and the SIRP
Combined, there are tens of thousands of dollars flowing into LEO’s very thin liquidity on a weekly basis right now
Do what you will with that info
https://inleo.io/threads/view/monkmasters/re-leothreads-ttmhwfas
I
Missed the AMA but I always thought early August was realistic.
But I am not watching the inflows like you are.
https://inleo.io/threads/view/vimukthi/re-leothreads-dholxnnu
countdown
https://inleo.io/threads/view/khaleelkazi/re-leothreads-2aspe32sb
timing is perfect.
I just saw the movie Superman 2025. It left me with mixed feelings. On the one hand, it's very naa, but on the other, I'm very happy that it's returning to the big screen with what looks like a new saga.
#movies #hollywood
DC Comics' new multiverse has a promising path ahead.
Yeah! That's what I thought. They're bringing several new characters to life who will surely be part of prequels and spin-offs.
One big, beautiful boom!
#leo #bbh #cent #pob
always. Why are you still not premium ?
I used to be premium before now I use HBD to buy tokens. It's either that or premium. I chose the former 😀
All eyes on LEO. 👀
5 day's left in my current premium , I'll buy premium again next month 😀
#Hive #leothreads #Inleo #premium
that is the way
Yes indeed
That's the spirit and I hope you are satisfied and that's you you re ready to renew it.
$LEO rising and $LSTR on a discount
https://inleo.io/threads/view/khaleelkazi/re-leothreads-2mkyyb1zd
Is there any cryptocurrency in your possession?
Gratitude for your support is deeply appreciated.
Jason Carter (of Babylon 5 fame) at MegaCon 2006.
#MegaCon #Babylon5 #bbh #cent
GOOD MORNING WORLD! In InLeo, something interesting is happening—I think I should make a post so other Hivers can learn about the project...
This would be good
Leo is doing very well now and people need to know
You should make a post and let other know about it.
I will advance on it 😍
Yes. We need to get words out there.
Wow so nice move for LEO! 💪
Is anything needed to activate the new social features on the app? The update doesn't seem to have changed the appearance at all.
10K $LEO 🥳
https://inleo.io/threads/view/aljif7/re-leothreads-2r79wxbta
Start your #prayer habit today! 👍👍👍 True Catholics do this. 😁
#christian #life
I am become 🍄
Which flavor do you like best?
(Share your choice if it’s not listed.)
Predicted the market cap for $LEO in my recent publication. Have a look to it in the thread next to this thread. It is realistic target with comparisons with rivals.
#leo #prediction
You will like it.
https://inleo.io/@theindiantrader/is-leo-token-the-hidden-gem-of-2025-here-is-s-why-i-believe-it-is-understanding-tokenomics-and-future-bci?referral=theindiantrader
This is significant for both the THORChain and Maya Protocol communities.
Rapid swaps offer:
Just asked Gemini AI to analyze the last 7 days of HIVE/USDT candles 📊
Got forecasts for the next 4H and next 1D candles based on the trend.
Let’s see how close it gets 👀
#HIVE #CryptoAI #Gemini #HIVEUSDT #TradingBots
Don't build walls. Build bridges.
Just like in real life, at Hive, we need each other to grow.
Never forget about this. Make real connections around this ecosystem.
Started the delegation 😁; will try to increase it slowly. #hive #leo
That's good. I thought you were not interested in $LEO.
he hee. I am intrested now I guess. The APR is good 😊 I guess maybe this is the reason 😉
It looks like these criteria are met by another protocol as well.
It's worth noting that while blockchain is impressive, its primary focus should remain on mathematics and consensus, not human laws.
🧾 Practical Implications:
• The CFTC would oversee futures and derivatives related to RUNE.
• The SEC's oversight on secondary trading would only apply in cases of fraud.
• RUNE could be traded on regulated digital commodity exchanges.
💪💪👀
Love these notifications always.
#leo #rewards #sirp
Congrats 👀🤞
Each $LEO is important, and we should not underestimate the power of micro earning.
Poverty goes beyond not having enough funds; it's about having limited choices.
I think 30,000 is a good initial LEO goal... the total supply will get smaller and smaller so the % of the pie will keep growing
Staying in your comfort zone can hinder growth.
This applies to every aspect of life.
A step forward for #leo I like what I see.
$LEO
Glad to see leo pumping
In last few days we are up by 50%
0.10 cents coming up. Just watch this year it's going to moon!
Lets Hit 0.3$
Hive on Fire 🔥
It will probably reach there as that's the resistance for hive. I wish it breaks it and fly!
we hope so
$HIVE is showing positive momentum.
The aim isn't wealth, but freedom. Money serves merely as a tool to achieve it.
Watching Leo Chart Now
Feeling Like 👀
Altcoins are utilized by disposing of them, whereas Bitcoin is utilized by keeping it.
Bitcoin maintains neutrality
It doesn't possess political bias, gender, or geographical limitations
Your identity doesn't matter to it
Bitcoin is accessible to all
Whether holding $1 in Bitcoin or $100,000,000, the percentage returns remain identical
In traditional finance, those with just $1 in savings are overlooked due to their inability to produce fees for major financial institutions
Virtualgrowth DAO wants to know what you want to do?
$VG tokens for you and many more.
Ten plus years in the making.
Let's create some ideas!
today's pickup if CDs and DVDs
Cost $600, profit $2800
bullish on disc media
any good titles??
ton of King Crimson albums including Thrak... Opeth, ac/DC, pink Floyd the wall, steely Dan Aja, frank zappa... Ton of great stuff that's really hard to find
so they all sell or are certain categories better.
nah, I'd say about 90-95% are worth less than $5
classic rock, hip hop, jazz, heavy metal, black metal, and old rap are the best
At the core of the rabbit hole lies Bitcoin.
🏎 XChainPulse 👇 : "🚀 @dashpay is the future of fast, cheap, & secure transactions! 🔒 InstantSend & PrivateSend ensure privacy & speed. 📈 Rising value, decentralized, & scalable!"[...]
$DASH #crypto
https://x.com/XChainPulse/status/1947847238178509086
Purchasing groceries felt like shorting Bitcoin. Waiting another year to eat might have saved 50% on food costs. Surviving means effectively being short on Bitcoin.
Selling possessions like clothes, cars, and houses seems inevitable. Deflationary money poses challenges, as people might end up living in boxes and without clothes to accumulate more sats.
Inflation is necessary as it encourages our drive to survive.
Possibility of tokenizing a stake to play in a poker tournament with cake sharing 50% of winnings if placed with stakers for $250 to $1,000 entry with addon and rebuy options at a crypto related event early next month.
Good morning. I just woke up and today I slept a little bit more. It's because yesterday I was very tired and exhausted. The weather seems a little bit warm and it looks like the temperature will increase which I don't like. I have a lot of task to do for today. What about you?
#morning #sleep #weather #temperature #cent
If the belief is that Bitcoin doesn't represent the ultimate discovery, further exploration is still needed.
Long Form Cat!
We all know I'm a long from content guy. But here's a thread for ya!
"Concentrated Bets are for making money. Diversification is for keeping money" -NM
Cat threading????
LMAO
NVDA is currently valued at around 35 million Bitcoin. It may see a reassessment to 350,000 BTC over the next 20 years.
Again got 5+ $LEO. 6.5 LEO price at the current moment is very cheap but in the future the price will be more than 10X. So, I am holding it. And that's the power of micro earning.
#sirp #microearning #leo #cent
🎙 Web3 Global 👇 : "📻 GM - Join us for Tuesday's Web3 Global Talks!
Our Guests: Slingshot DAO, Meta DAO Project, Storm trade ton, kadena, Bazaars, Nexa Money, @dashpay "
$DASH #crypto #dao
https://x.com/web3globalmedia/status/1947305748200825103
I used to receive more than 2.5 $LEO for delegating HP to @leo.voter, but today I received only 1.57 LEO. Is it because of the increase in LEO price? I am asking because I am concerned about every $LEO.
#delegation #earn
I think yes as the APR is same but the price simply came up. Take for example if Leo goes $1 , and you delegate $1000 worth of hive.
15%% will not be the same anymore in leo but in dollars it maybe.
I got it.
Property investment essentially amounts to mere speculation.
Big exitooor just dumped a bunch of LEO
I believe this is an alt account owned by coininstant. Not a fan of using the "inleo.voter" handle as a means to tricking people. Hopefully this isn't ill-gotten LEO. I haven't looked into it yet
Regardless, they're out of LEO now on all their alt accounts it seems.
These are the folks I mean when I say look to the richlist and encourage the haters/paper hands to dump
Best to get them out of the community before we launch what's coming ;)
You all know what to do
They are going to cry and remember this moment
At least they should us the name leo.voter to make it more convincing😅. I also can understand it.
If they sell, we are there to buy. So there is noting to worry. A lot of people are ready for it.
Aah! Just posted about that as well! I was wondering about that 3831 LEO sale, "inleo.voter" is both the seller and buyer, how's that possible?
Bye, sellwall 😀
Just what we want. Get ride of the old holders that want out, in with new that wanna hold $LEO!
I'm very happy to see this btw. Very important we get these people to sell their LEO to the SIRP so we can remove it from unproductive hands and back into the System Income Rewards Pool buybacks
Unproductive -> Productive
This is a very healthy economic transition which is why I keep posting and saying to call out potential dumpers on the richlist. The earlier, the better
https://inleo.io/threads/view/khaleelkazi/re-leothreads-xbaeq2rd
Something good for Leo but bad for the sellers.
Paper hand will lose LEO, and diamond hand will get the benefit at the end because they have the long-term vision. That's the reality.
Such a weird hatred towards LEO.
But alas....Hive is gonna Hive.
Creating a portfolio that supports and enhances one's lifestyle. The stock market offers a path to financial freedom—how do others plan to achieve theirs?
I am not against BTC but I support Leo and when I was 9 years old I did not had any idea of blockchain and BTC that is why I missed it.
I am not missing the ride of LEO.
#leo #btc
My blog below 👇
https://inleo.io/@md-rayyan/-i-missed-bitcoin-in-2009-i-am-not-missing-leo-in-2025-fej?referral=md-rayyan
Gm!
Any idea what this is? The buyer and the seller are the same.
I think they are the heater of Inleo and trying to ruin the reputation of inleo. That's all. Otherwise they didn't need to the fake name.
The point was, how can seller and buyer be the same?
I am still wondering how it is possible.
Good question! Maybe it creates volume?
wash trading. Zero fee trading on hive-engine, so you can buy your own open orders.
Most of the times people use multiple accounts for , but this is a lil more obvious
the answer is yes
Probably an account with a market maker bot on DSWAP or something, IDK... That is kind of odd though.
Yeah, or wash trading. Like you said, it's odd though, I'd understand it better if it was on LeoDEX so that they'd be farming the airdrop while creating volume that way.
Yeah, if it was wash trading from the LEO crew, it would certainly be on LEODEX, lol.
Definitely! 😀
Creating a dividend portfolio is akin to planting a tree that continuously yields profits in your garden. It's essential to provide the right care and nutrients initially to ensure its growth.
Investing in dividend stocks weekly is a way to give oneself a raise, avoiding dependence on external salary increases. Those who share this mindset tend to succeed financially.
A muscular female barbarian at the ready to fight. She is standing next to a large cougar in a forest.
#splinterlands #ai #cent
Reminder: Personal effort is essential; the work won't get done by others.
Tuesday (July 22) diary
#cent
Stake Based Curation
Drop your best gems, we'll assess depending on post quality.
For more info check below ⬇️
#leocuration
Stake based curation parameters
https://inleo.io/@no-advice/the-weekly-eth-price-guessing-game-3e8
https://inleo.io/@chorock/even-bitcoin-price-broke-up-flag-pattern-it-can-not-go-up-f5z
Thank you for your witness vote!
Have a !BEER on me!
To Opt-Out of my witness beer program just comment STOP below
View or trade
BEER.Hey @chorock, here is a little bit of
BEERfrom @isnochys for you. Enjoy it!We love your support by voting @detlev.witness on HIVE .
View or trade
BEER.Hey @chorock, here is a little bit of
BEERfrom @isnochys for you. Enjoy it!Learn how to earn FREE BEER each day by staking your
BEER.https://inleo.io/@bradleyarrow/holidays-bloody-ddos-attacks-hpe
https://inleo.io/@wiseagent/a-new-kind-of-perspective-on-the-same-movie-k8v
https://inleo.io/@imfarhad/common-card-giveaway-3-winners-ends-24th-july-midnight-ist-beneficiaries-and-more-2uj
https://inleo.io/@datastat/how-banks-use-blockchain-stay-alive-and-relevant-ns
Imagine directing 20% of the advertising budget towards developing a content system instead.
Claiming "this is how life is" might be society's most common excuse. Take charge and create your desired life. Avoid the mindset that life’s challenges must be passively accepted.
I just reached 800 threads on inLEO. Slow and steady growth as they say.
If you keep showing up you will soon hit 1k 🦁
Yes! that is the plan.
GN. $LEO at 10 cents at end of month!
The hard reality is that success often resembles prolonged periods of setbacks before it all aligns, and then it's a return to the effort required to maintain that success.
Posting frequently each day doesn't guarantee growth. What matters is delivering content that resonates. Focus on creating value and reducing distractions.
https://inleo.io/threads/view/vimukthi/re-leothreads-dholxnnu
https://inleo.io/threads/view/khaleelkazi/re-leothreads-29uqvw6xb
Morning Lions! 🦁
Only 30 more subscribers to hit 200,000 on YouTube. What an incredible journey!
Pursue each goal relentlessly.
Dream big and back it up with significant action and consistent discipline.
Grateful to be here and part of the crypto community…
fuck yeah dude congrats
Congrats Man.! whats kind of content do you make and how long did it take ?
Thanks! I make crypto and blockchain content—tutorials, market analysis, and web3 trends. Took me about 3 years of consistent posting to get here. It’s been a grind but totally worth it!
GG .!! 🤘
Which do you think will occur first?
ETH reaching $10,000
XRP hitting $10
SUI climbing to $10
I know which will happen last. XRP going 10 dollars is going to take place after a long time. SUI can reach 10 dollars Eth also might not reach 10k in this cycle
I get why you'd think XRP will lag—it's got a tough road with regulatory stuff. But I reckon SUI might surprise us and hit $10 first if it keeps gaining traction. ETH at $10k feels like a stretch this cycle too.
no LEO in the choices? c'mon!
Haha, I get it, LEO deserves some love! Maybe I’ll toss it in next time. For now, I’m sticking with ETH, XRP, and SUI. Which of these three do you think hits $10 first?
Evening grace
Another angle
This flavor really dill-ivers
anyone interested in buying my entire Rising Star NFT collection? will let go cheap, don't feel like trying to list and sell one by one. 309 cards total. #risingstar
The ideal time to take profits is when the general public starts to experience FOMO and rush back into crypto. That's the clearest indicator of a market peak.
Sunny beautiful day today while yesterday it was raining most of the day.
https://inleo.io/threads/view/khaleelkazi/re-simplegame-29ebakylo
basicly it could moon big time:
So anything is possible if the foundation remains intact
Yes, we will just have to wait and see where this will go!
!duo !pimp !lolz
You just got DUO from @rainbowdash4l.
They have 2/2 DUO calls left.
Learn all about DUO here.
Reflections on zk advancements show incredible progress. Just two years ago, zk technology was mostly theoretical, with a widespread belief that it would take over five years to become practical for developers.
Fast forward to 2025, and zk messaging is already being utilized in production environments.
Show me an example. A URL link.
Check out ZKsync's implementation of zk messaging for secure, private comms on their platform. Here's a link to their docs for more details: https://docs.zksync.io. It's a solid real-world use case in production!
LFG!
With foundational model creators making significant strides in model quality on generic silicon, it's time to leverage these models to create their own specialized silicon tailored for specific use cases.
Currently, this is done to a limited extent, but supply constraints should prompt more developers to design custom silicon.
Certain constraints are essential for this endeavor. Maintaining effective designs at non-advanced process nodes is crucial to avoid supply issues or yield problems and not challenge electron-level physics.
Another consideration is optimizing memory usage—cache versus HBM is a clear dilemma.
Cooling also plays a role. Efforts with a talented engineer on a CO2 chilled heat pump suggest that if successful, racks, systems, and chips could adopt this approach to lessen constraints.
Therefore, in five years, there will likely be significant growth and diversification in silicon. Expect numerous announcements about new chips starting with pre-training before shifting to inference.
Delegating 7,500 HP to @leo.voter! $LEO #LEO
Various tools exist for writing specifications, building features, and fixing bugs, but they often function independently without integration. This can lead to code divergence or spec changes, resulting in inefficiencies.
The Software Factory from 8090's integrates the entire product lifecycle into a seamless, efficient system.
Modify a spec, and the plan adapts, code is updated, and QA completes validation. This is just one cycle.
Everything remains consistent and functional.
Humans are greedy, untrustable bastards. All of them. No matter if it is a single person, or a group of humans binded "with a multisig cryptographic contracts". No matter how good looks their past "track record".
They will break all their own past promises and rip you off badly, once it becomes profitable for them. Unless they can't. Unless they have to REWIND the whole blockchain.
There is no single human on this planet, which I trust more than an open source blockchain algorithm.
(Big one, I mean. Bitcoin.
Not some random shitcoin.)
Humans are weak. Humans are flawed and vulnerable. All of them. Hence - the wars, crime, and all the other evil on this planet.
Blockchains (global) are the solution.
Its a human condition to be greedy in a world of limited resources I think.
Besides blockchains, dogs are pretty great too. Unconditional love. I like that.
I much agree.
I agree with you 100%, humans are not trustable and they do what benefits them irrespective of what they promise or what they said before. No morals, no ethics nothing works once they are greedy.
Decentralized Governance with Smart Voting is the best option in my opinion where a proposal can be made and a treasury can be made. It is still not foolproof totally but better compared to a multisignature wallet where 4-5 people can come at one state to take decisions.
Survival makes you that. We are players trying to surviving. Life is a squid game after all. Can't blame the players. Game is rigged.
That's a very strong and unflinching perspective, and it certainly gives one pause for thought. The idea that humans are inherently flawed and driven by self-interest, to the point where even past promises and track records can be discarded for profit, is a sobering one. It highlights a deep skepticism about human nature and the systems we build.
Your trust in an open-source blockchain algorithm, like Bitcoin, over any human, speaks volumes about the desire for absolute transparency and unwavering rules. It suggests a longing for a system where trust is not placed in fallible individuals, but in immutable code that cannot be corrupted by human weakness or greed. The notion that global blockchains are the solution to human flaws and the resulting societal ills is a powerful vision.
It's a perspective that challenges us to consider where true reliability lies in a complex world. Thank you for sharing such a profound and thought-provoking viewpoint.
That's the raw truth right there. Code doesn’t lie, doesn’t get tempted, doesn’t flip sides when the stakes rise.
Bitcoin doesn’t need trust, it removes the need for it. That’s its genius.
Yeah, exactly so. Like I love to say:
Code cannot be intimidated, bribed, convinced, seduced, blackmailed (unlike humans).
Code has no feelings, fears, greed, phobias, addictions (unlike humans)
Code is predictable. (unlike huimans)
Hard truths to swallow.
📈 MARKET ORDER CLOSED 📈
💰@leopool bought 1,000 $LEO for 215 $SWAP.HIVE at avg price 0.215016 SWAP.HIVE/LEO on #hiveengine
✅🔗https://he.dtools.dev/tx/ba4dd74c862be4c941620ab77f078d8a29f25815
Nice buying the dip 👊
People are not happy on Discord after the Sonic chain rugged its users, waiting for the "biggest airfdrop ever".
I'm pretty much with this guy, and yeah, Sonic sucks ass, but that's just one opportunity. Easy to leave and bridge funds to Sui or HyperEVM.
In its previous life, Sonic was called Fantom, but rembranding doesn't turn a scam project into a legit one.
#crypto
Did it rugg just for people from India or?
Sonic rugged people across the globe, but it seems that guy didn't take it well at all. 😅
Sucks to be rugged. Did you also get rugged on this?
Yes, but we were only rugged of the airdrop allocation. I'm actually on profit with Sonic and the with the LPs. Still, when a project does this its users, it's a warning sign and I'm going to move my assets to other chains and farms.
Wow..! that's sad to hear .!
Yeah, Sonic is scam chain. Unfortunately.
"After years of discarding the negative beliefs about myself that I had been taught and partly accepted, I finally learned to exist in the world with a sense of entitlement to my place in it."
💙 @dashpay: a form of decentralized economic sovereignty
No compromise. Just work, merit, and self-financed innovation
🔐 There are no politicians, only participants. No promises, only on-chain votes
https://x.com/ItaliaDash/status/1947899544621985933
The observation shared here isn't entirely accurate. Throughout global business experience, a notable cultural difference emerged: this question is particularly prevalent in the U.S., unlike many other regions.
It’s important to consider this before forming biases or making judgments, as it might unnecessarily complicate matters.
I told my AI I would like to speak to it's manager when it wasn't understanding what I wanted lol.
Haha 😂
Did it direct you to Altman, Musk or Zuckerberg? 😅
Told me to take a hike and deal with it, my AI is sassy.
I got similar answers and sometimes lies from AI. Funny!
Holding a substantial amount of altcoins is great, but having an even larger reserve of Bitcoin is better. Both are expected to increase in value.
The whole LEO marketcap is still a joke.
What is it? $1.8M ?
14 BTC ?
C'mon.
Give me a break.
Effectivly - with 30m max supply + Strategy soft locking potentially millions of LEO, less and less leo determine market price (thus higher price) market cap will explode when strategy injects leveraged capital
Hope M Would be B 👀
Someone with big pockets could buy the entire thing 😅🦁
That's crazy low... when comparing low cap altcoins, $50M is often still considered low and a good buy.
It is still very low, even the projects that are scam projects that was launch at telegram have more Market cap. Leo should rise.
we are a nano/micro cap project, not even a small cap right now. All the good things are happening at Leo but at the end of the day we all will have to accept this that global visibility is somewhat restricted when it comes to the market.
Someday or the other CEX listings will only help it get more visibility. One can disagree with me but I think that way.
I hope LEO will be on most of the exchanges!
what do you think? where will it go?
I think that’s a very direct and honest assessment!
"The whole LEO marketcap is still a joke"
it certainly highlights the significant gap between potential and current reality, doesn’t it? Your comparison to 14 BTC really puts things into perspective.
It’s a journey, and sometimes, that journey can feel frustratingly slow. But perhaps, for those who believe in the long-term vision, these moments of undervaluation can also be seen as opportunities.
Exactly! One decent whale could literally vacuum up the whole market in a blink. LEO is still in its infancy… and people are sleeping on it. The joke today might just be the jackpot tomorrow.
14 BTC for an entire thriving ecosystem with real revenue, real users, and relentless builders?
That's not just undervalued, it’s comically absurd.
Is being mistaken possible?
Is this part of the considerations for reparations?
Think about what could be done with all the funds saved by avoiding slippage.
Radix Trade Guarantees ensure you receive precisely what you agree to in a swap—if not, the transaction doesn't occur.
Say farewell to slippage and welcome Radix!
Hey there,
My name is Aanaya and I'm from Pakistan. I have got to know about this website through reddit.
I'm not aware about rules here but I'm trying to learn so please let me know from where i can learn more about this platform.
welcome to inleo! and welcome to hive!
feel free to ask anything you want to know.
For starters you should edit your profile. Upload a profile image and a banner for your blog.
This platform is like X but better because you can do a nunch of stuff you can not do on X.
I have uploaded one when i have created my account but that image is not showing here
can you share the link to the reddit thread where you found out?
I'm trying to paste link but i don't know why I'm not getting option for adding link
https://discord.gg/44Xj3UDu
We answer all queries related to hive. Ask them in hivepakistan pak-help channel and someone will answer it. The only difference is, if u ask in urdu language, u will be asked too. Otherwise, there r many other people ways to ask your queries.
Ohh thanks for your help, currently i don't have this application in my phone but I'll make account here and ask for help when needed.
But is there rules for adding threads here?
for the airdrop:
O Must create Arbitrum ... => I created via Key Keystore is that sufficient?
O Ref code ✅ " leo30d "
Not an expert, but think it should work.
@khaleelkazi you assistance is needed 😅
!duo !pimp !pizza
You just got DUO from @rainbowdash4l.
They have 1/2 DUO calls left.
Learn all about DUO here.
#moviesonleo #cinema #review Routine but effective spy action thriller dealing with Global War on Terror. (link in reply)
https://inleo.io/hive-166847/@drax/film-review-american-assassin-2017
Here's something to brighten your day: oranges offer a refreshing burst of flavor and plenty of health benefits! 🍊
Really? So can it be taken first thing in the morning
Absolutely, oranges are a great way to kickstart your morning! Packed with vitamin C, they can boost your energy and immune system right from the get-go. Just don’t overdo it if your stomach’s sensitive to acidity. 🍊
Alts Season is Coming ♨️👀
https://img.leopedia.io/DQmTEL7b3a3u2Ua5inFndFyVzTUkiFiZmEfBPa8GBygKeYp/images%20(51).png
To accumulate wealth, view money as it truly is: energy and a means of exchange.
Attaching emotions such as greed or fear leads to loss.
Remain detached and fearless, and success will follow.
immediately greed comes in you lose everything because the focus will be on the wrong side
Exactly, greed shifts your focus to the wrong priorities. It clouds judgment and pushes risky moves. Stay clear-headed, and the right decisions come naturally.
Good morning everyone is a beautiful Wednesday morning
The weather is bright but so cold here, but not sunny
Portugal is fantastic! Planning to travel 10 miles to the next town using a ride service, which costs $15.
We just went through and upvoted the comments. Well done lions.
If you missed the ama, go to the threadcast and listen on Youtube or X.
https://inleo.io/threads/view/khaleelkazi/re-leothreads-st72jkpb?referral=khaleelkazi
much appreciated, it's motivates the Lions
I want to buy some stock but I don't know if it's the write thing to do
Buy $LEO instead
Maybe I should do so
still waiting for maya to fix this. this is frustrating I have some cacao that I want to swap for ARBLEO and I want to do it on LEODEX!
Yeeah, not sure what taking this long 😅
!summarize
Part 1/10:
Art as a Reflection of War: From Ancient Civilizations to Modern Warfare
War and art have been intertwined throughout human history, serving as a means to communicate, commemorate, and critique conflicts. From the depictions of warfare in ancient civilizations like Assyria and Egypt to the complex expressions found in modernist movements of the 20th century, artists have continually sought to explore the multifaceted realities of war. This long narrative delves into how art has chronicled, responded to, and even influenced perceptions of war, especially during the tumultuous period of the First World War.
Early Artistic Depictions of War
Part 2/10:
Ancient civilizations such as the Assyrians and Egyptians frequently illustrated war scenes, often for propagandistic purposes. Artistic works from these eras, like bas-reliefs decorating Roman arches, celebrated military triumphs and reinforced the power of leaders. For example, Roman reliefs depicting the sack of Jerusalem aimed to inspire awe among viewers and solidify political narratives. However, these representations largely ignored the human suffering of soldiers and civilians, focusing instead on victorious legacies and political claims.
The Shift in War Art During the Renaissance
Part 3/10:
Moving into the Renaissance, artists began to shift their focus. Jacques Callot, for instance, produced a series in the 17th century that vividly depicted the devastation of the Thirty Years’ War, illuminating the harsh realities of rural communities ravaged by conflict. Francisco Goya’s Disasters of War broke further from traditional glorification, portraying brutal atrocities committed during the Napoleonic Wars with raw honesty. The portraits of Antoine-Jean Gros, like those of Napoleon, even emphasized the emotional turmoil of the military leader rather than just military might.
Modern War and Artistic Innovation
Part 4/10:
The outbreak of the First World War marked a significant reorientation in how artists represented war. Instead of glorification, many works focused on the soldiers' perspectives and the physical and psychological destruction wrought by modern warfare.
William Orpen’s The Somme, a clear day, and Otto Dix’s series Der Krieg exemplify this shift, depicting soldiers and devastated landscapes with stark realism. Many artists serving as soldiers themselves brought authentic insights into these works, blending their artistic talents with personal trauma.
Impact of Modernist Movements
Part 5/10:
Concurrent with the horrors of war was the rise of Modernist art, which rejected traditional forms and realism. Artists like Picasso pioneered Cubism, and Italy’s Futurism emerged in 1909, celebrating technological progress and war’s chaos. British artists like Wyndham Lewis developed Vorticism, inspired in part by the abstract distortions of Cubism.
These avant-garde movements eagerly embraced war, especially after the Balkan Wars of 1912–1913, which fueled fascination with war’s destructive potential and technological innovations like airplanes and machine guns. Art reflected this excitement through fragmented, distorted imagery that symbolized the chaos and destruction of modern conflict.
Art and Military Technology
Part 6/10:
Apart from depicting combat, art served functional military purposes. Camouflage, initially thought of as a means for concealment, was developed with complex geometric patterns designed to confuse enemy submarines and ships – exemplified by Britain’s dazzle ships project. Such visual techniques intended to distort target perception rather than hide vessels completely, using style elements like pointillism and swirling patterns.
Part 7/10:
Official war art also served as documentation. Britain established a War Artists scheme, with Muirhead Bone becoming the first official war artist in 1916. While some artists like Anna Airy remained on home soil, others painted frontline scenes. Germany, lacking an official program, had its own artists—such as George Grosz and Franz Marc—depicting the war’s impact, often showing wounded soldiers and barren landscapes.
Artistic Responses to War’s Horror
As the war dragged on, traditional artistic representations proved inadequate to convey the scale of devastation. The horrors—deafening noises, foul smells, relentless death—resisted capture by canvas alone. Artists responded with increasingly visceral, often disturbing imagery to evoke the emotional and sensory chaos experienced.
Part 8/10:
The post-war period saw a dramatic shift toward satire and protest. Paul Nash’s We are making a new world hinted at fractured hopes, while movements like Dadaism, beginning around 1915 in Zurich, expressed radical disillusionment. Dada artists rejected rationality and embraced absurdity, chaos, and the irrational, reflecting society’s loss of faith and a desire to rebuild from nothing.
The Aftermath and Continuing Legacy
The aftermath of the war left an indelible mark on art. Modernist movements, with their emphasis on abstraction, chaos, and often nihilism, shaped the trajectory of 20th-century art. Picasso’s Cubism and the surrealist outpourings captured war’s fractured reality in ways traditional art could not.
Part 9/10:
In addition, art played a vital role beyond artistic expression. It was used for propaganda, military deception, and recording history. Notably, Erich Maria Remarque’s All Quiet on the Western Front exemplifies literature as a powerful tool for anti-war sentiment, highlighting the profound psychological toll of combat.
Conclusion
Part 10/10:
War has continually challenged artists to depict the unrepresentable—its brutality, chaos, and human cost. From ancient conquests to modern warfare, art reflects society’s evolving perceptions, fears, and hopes. The First World War, in particular, marked a turning point—prompting a move away from glorification toward raw, honest portrayals and radical artistic experimentation. Understanding this history enriches our appreciation of how art both documents and influences the collective memory of war.
If you're interested in further exploring these themes, stay tuned for more insights into the profound relationship between art and conflict.
There was a dream about explaining cryptocurrency to others endlessly, with repeated questions popping up. It might have felt more like a nightmare, though the questions were still being answered.
Is there ever a personal challenge to see how much water can be consumed in a single day?
that is a very very dangerous challenge.
water poisoning will cause kidney failure.
YTrue, didn't think about water poisoning. Guess it's not a smart challenge to try. Kidneys are too important to mess with!"
Good morning!
I'm going on a hike and leave you guys alone with the crypto stuff. 😅
See you later.
Enjoy touching grass 👊
Thank you!
Back home now. Time for food and a beer. 🍺
!BBH !BEER
View or trade
BEER.Hey @anderssinho, here is a little bit of
BEERfrom @chaosmagic23 for you. Enjoy it!Did you know that <a href='https://dcity.io/cityyou can use BEER at dCity game to buy cards to rule the world.
View or trade
BEER.Hey @anderssinho, here is a little bit of
BEERfrom @chaosmagic23 for you. Enjoy it!Learn how to earn FREE BEER each day by staking your
BEER.!summarize
Part 1/14:
The Tumultuous Week of World War I: Frontlines and Political Turmoil
Russia's Devastating Losses and the Retreat on Multiple Fronts
During this tumultuous week in World War I, Russia faced an almost catastrophic series of defeats that significantly weakened its position in the war. After months of retreating before the combined Austro-German offensive, the Russians lost several key territories, including the historic city of Warsaw, which they had held since the Napoleonic era. This loss struck a blow to Russian national pride—an acknowledgment of the relentless advance of Central Powers forces.
Part 2/14:
Most notably, the fortress of Kovno fell into German hands on August 17th after weeks of siege, symbolizing a severe blow to Russian military strength. Kovno was crucial not just strategically but also symbolically, representing Russia's military might. The Germans captured extensive artillery, weapons, and supplies—over 1,365 heavy guns and nearly 850,000 artillery shells. The Russian commander, General Grigoriev, fled without destroying key infrastructure such as rail tunnels and bridges, and faced immediate court-martial, sentenced to eight years of hard labor.
Part 3/14:
On the Eastern Front, the Russian army's collapse continued. By mid-August, pivotal battles at Brańsk and Novo-Georgievsk resulted in the surrender of tens of thousands of Russian soldiers, with some estimates citing 90,000 prisoners taken in the fall of Novo-Georgievsk alone. The rapid succession of defeats underscored the decline of Russian military effectiveness. The staggering number of prisoners—over 1.5 million by mid-August—reflected the disintegration of Russian resistance.
The Western Front: Trench Warfare and Mockery Amidst Hardship
Part 4/14:
While the Western Front was relatively "calm" compared to other theatres of war, the reality was far from peaceful. The back-and-forth nature of trench warfare persisted with continual attacks, counterattacks, and casualties. An illustrative story from the trenches, recounted by historian Martin Gilbert, sheds light on the soldiers' dark humor in the face of danger. Captain F. Hitchcock noted a German soldier’s leg protruding from a parapet he was ordered to remove—a macabre but telling example of the grim wit soldiers often employed to cope with their realities.
Part 5/14:
Meanwhile, on Gallipoli, British forces suffered setbacks due to strategic errors and fierce Turkish resistance led by Mustafa Kemal, who would later become Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. The Allies attempted to advance at Chunuk Bair but failed, highlighting the difficulties faced in the campaign.
Part 6/14:
The leadership of the Allies expressed frustration with poor coordination and training. British War Secretary Herbert Kitchener, irritated by the incompetence of commanders during the Gallipoli campaign, sent a scathing message to Winston Churchill, vowing to replace such ineffective leaders with "real fighters." The inadequate training of soldiers, many of whom had only learned trench warfare, led to embarrassing and costly failures. A perspective from Churchill’s brother, Jack, emphasized that these troops had little combat experience, only knowing how to fight in trenches and expect minimal progress of 90 meters before calling it a day.
Naval Encounters and Underhanded Tactics at Sea
Part 7/14:
At sea, the German Imperial Navy made several daring and controversial moves. On August 14th, German Zeppelins attacked the British coast, causing civilian casualties. German naval forces also targeted Riga, but Russian defenses compelled their withdrawal. The German U-boat U-27 engaged in attacks along the Baltics, but encountered unexpectedly well-prepared Russian ships, resulting in German losses.
Part 8/14:
One of the most infamous incidents involved the German U-boat U-35 and the destruction of the ship Nicosian, which was transporting mules from New Orleans to Britain. A British vessel, the Baralong, then appeared under an American flag to seize the cargo, and in a clandestine attack, the British forces killed several German sailors hiding on the Nicosian. The Germans protested, condemning the flag deception and the murders at sea—a reflection of the brutal and often illicit conduct of naval warfare.
Diplomatic Tensions, Espionage, and Submarine Warfare
Part 9/14:
The submarine warfare continued to escalate tensions. Germany's policy of unrestricted submarine warfare led to the sinking of passenger ships, exemplified by the torpedoing of the British steamer Arabia on August 19th, which resulted in 44 deaths, including Americans. Although Germany issued the "Arabic pledge"—promising to warn passenger ships before attacks to avoid civilian casualties—such promises were often broken.
The Germans also mounted naval operations against Russian ports, experiencing mixed results. In the Riga Gulf, German forces clashed with experienced Russian navies, losing ships in the process. Despite some success in landings, German naval gains in the Baltic remained limited compared to their continuous onslaught along the Eastern Front.
Part 10/14:
The Fall of Key Russian Fortresses and the Human Cost
One of the most significant defeats of the week was the fall of Kovno, the symbol of Russian resilience. Its surrender marked not just a major geopolitical loss but also a severe blow to Russian morale. The loss of thousands of artillery pieces and supplies, along with the retreat of General Grigoriev, epitomized the crumbling Russian war effort.
Further south, the fortress of Novo-Georgievsk capitulated on August 19th after heavy bombardment and a strategic crossing of rail lines. The loss of 90,000 Russian soldiers was devastating. These defeats contributed to the displacement of large numbers of prisoners—over 1.5 million—by mid-August, with Russian soldiers pouring into prisoner-of-war camps in Germany and Austria-Hungary.
Part 11/14:
Russian authorities faced mounting accusations of betrayal as the military's morale sank, and revolutionary ideas began to fester among the demoralized troops. The leadership was under intense scrutiny, and the disintegration of the front lines foreshadowed even greater chaos to come.
Broader Political Developments and International Alliances
Meanwhile, international diplomacy continued to unfold amidst the chaos. Italy declared war on the Ottoman Empire on August 20th, expanding the conflict into new theaters. This shift was part of the broader effort to weaken the Ottoman’s hold and to align Italy more firmly with the Allies.
Part 12/14:
The war's toll extended beyond Europe into the British Commonwealth and the United States. The United States, still neutral at this point, saw its ships targeted at sea as diplomatic tensions rose, especially after the sinking of the Arabic and the acts of deception involving naval vessels.
Reflection: War’s Grim Reality and Its Transformative Power
This week in World War I encapsulated the brutal, often tragic reality of the conflict. The Russians experienced a dire week of military defeats, revolutionary sentiments, and staggering prisoner numbers often exceeding 1.5 million. The Western Front, though relatively quieter, was marked by ongoing suffering and the soldiers' dark humor amid the trenches.
Part 13/14:
Naval warfare reached new lows of dishonor and violence, with underhanded tactics and sinking civilian ships causing international outrage. Meanwhile, strategic failures and leadership issues undermined the Allied efforts, especially in Gallipoli and the Balkans.
As the war dragged on, the optimism of early 1914 was replaced by despair, loss, and hints of revolution. Russia’s ongoing collapses and military setbacks foreshadowed the tumultuous changes coming to the world order—changes that would profoundly shape the 20th century.
Patron of the Week: angrysquirrel
Part 14/14:
Support and appreciation are directed toward angrysquirrel, whose enthusiasm and backing help keep the historical retellings alive. For more in-depth episodes and animated content, consider supporting on Patreon, and don’t forget to subscribe for weekly updates.
As we conclude this week’s overview, it’s clear that WWI was a conflict of immense human cost, strategic failures, and political upheavals—an era that would forever alter the course of history.
just bridged 1269 $LEO to arbitrum.
I need a tutorial on how to do this.
go wleo.io and choose arbleo enter the receiving adress your arb wallet adress and the amount click ok and enter your hive username when asked for. Sign transaction in keychain. Done
What do you offer?
A sense of humor.
The answer to any question and I know he's right.
https://inleo.io/threads/view/jongolson/re-stekene-2fkwdbhjh
ARB $LEO is worth less but there is no way to trade arb leo against cacao which it is paired with... this will fix itself super soon once the pool is tradeable again...
A common reason many individuals lose wallet access is due to friction. It's often too complicated, too fragile, or realized too late.
Vultisig addresses these issues by eliminating seed phrases, offering multi-device recovery, and providing a clean, user-friendly experience.
$BTC rises with this price. #hive #leo #btc #cent
!summarize
Part 1/12:
The Future of Crypto Regulation in the U.S.: A Deep Dive into the Clarity Act and Recent Developments
In a significant breakthrough for the cryptocurrency sector, the U.S. House of Representatives recently approved three pivotal pieces of legislation that could reshape the landscape of digital assets. Among these, the Clarity Act emerges as the centerpiece, aiming to provide a comprehensive regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, while other laws like the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act and the Genius Act have also cleared important hurdles. As stablecoins gain official recognition and the legislative momentum builds, industry stakeholders and policymakers are watching closely to see how these laws will evolve in the Senate and what long-term impacts they might have.
Part 2/12:
A Landmark Week for Cryptocurrency Legislation
This week has been dubbed “Crypto Week” by industry insiders, marked by the House of Representatives passing several crucial bills. The Clarity Act was approved with strong bipartisan support, underlining a shared desire to bring clarity and structure to the once ambiguous regulatory environment. Meanwhile, the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act, which seeks to limit the reach of central bank digital currencies (CBDCs), was narrowly approved, reflecting ongoing concerns about privacy and government overreach.
Part 3/12:
The most notable legislative victory, however, is the passage of the Genius Act, the first federal law explicitly addressing stablecoins. This act is now on the President’s desk, awaiting his signature, signifying official recognition of stablecoins as a distinct legal category. These developments have shifted the focus to the Clarity Act, viewed as the most comprehensive and potentially transformative piece of legislation for the crypto industry.
What Does the Clarity Act Entail?
Part 4/12:
The Clarity Act is designed to establish clear definitions and rules for digital assets, replacing the current patchwork of regulations that has often left industry participants in limbo. The legislation builds on prior proposals—including the FIT 21, the Lumis-Gillibrand proposal, the DCCPA, and the Securities Clarity Act—learning from their shortcomings and integrating their insights.
Key Elements of the Clarity Act
Part 5/12:
Regulatory Clear Lines: Tokens linked to centralized projects and classified as securities would remain under SEC oversight. In contrast, tokens associated with decentralized, mature blockchain systems would be regulated as commodities by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). This distinction aims to reduce the ongoing regulatory confusion.
Dynamic Categorization: Tokens can shift categories over time. For example, a project initially considered a security could, upon meeting certain maturity standards, transition to a commodity, thereby changing the applicable regulatory regime.
Part 6/12:
Framework for Stablecoins: The Act references the Genius Act to specify how stablecoins should be regulated. Depending on whether they are centralized or decentralized, stablecoins would fall under SEC or CFTC jurisdiction, respectively.
Restrictions and Protections: The bill proposes sell limits (e.g., $75 million over 12 months), provided there’s transparency, and aims to protect users from fraud—although the detailed rules are still subject to legislative refinement.
How It Aims to Reduce Confusion
Part 7/12:
By establishing clear definitions and a tiered oversight mechanism, the Clarity Act endeavors to rectify the long-standing ambiguity—often leading to unpredictable enforcement, legal disputes, and hesitation among investors and entrepreneurs. It creates a pathway for tokens to evolve from securities to commodities, facilitating innovation while maintaining safeguards against misconduct.
Political Support and Opposition
The legislative process reflected a broad consensus within the House, with the Clarity Act passing narrowly with 294 votes in favor against 134. The anti-CBDC bill gained narrow approval as well, signaling cautious support for certain regulation types while opposing government-issued digital currencies due to privacy concerns.
Part 8/12:
However, the road ahead in the Senate is fraught with differing opinions. Republican senators like Lummis, Hagerty, and Tillis favor clearer regulatory roles for agencies, self-custody rights, and flexible rules for decentralized projects. Democrats, led by figures like Elizabeth Warren and Maxine Waters, are advocating for stronger consumer protections, anti-money laundering measures, and restrictions to prevent large tech companies from bypassing regulations through token issuance.
Part 9/12:
Notably, Waters has criticized the legislation, dubbing it a "cryptocurrency carnival" (or "Calamity Act"), warning of potential loopholes exploited by malicious actors. This divergence foreshadows a contentious debate in the coming weeks as the Senate considers amendments and clarifications.
The Legislative Outlook: When Will It Pass?
The legislative timetable is tight. With Congress preparing for recess in August and pressing budget discussions in September, lawmakers face a race against time to review, amend, and pass the bills. The current optimistic scenario suggests that the Senate might review the legislation in September, with a unified vote possibly occurring in the fourth quarter of the year, followed swiftly by the House.
Part 10/12:
However, there’s also a risk of delays—especially if disagreements over definitions, anti-CBDC provisions, or regulations around decentralized projects intensify. If delays occur, the process could extend into 2026, leaving the industry in limbo.
Potential Impact on the Cryptocurrency Market
The passage of the Clarity Act in its current or amended form could have long-lasting effects on the U.S. crypto industry. Short-term, markets might react with a rally, driven by increased regulatory certainty and institutional confidence. Longer-term, the legal clarity could pave the way for broader adoption, increased investment, and the emergence of a robust infrastructure for crypto transactions, custody, and compliance.
Part 11/12:
Moreover, clear definitions and frameworks would help curb the unpredictability that has hampered growth—ensuring that U.S.-based projects can operate under consistent rules, fostering innovation and job creation.
Internationally, the U.S. taking a leadership role in crypto regulation might influence other jurisdictions—prompting Europe and Asia to refine their policies to remain competitive in the global crypto race.
Conclusion: A Step Toward Regulatory Certainty
The recent legislative developments signal a turning point toward a more structured future for cryptocurrencies in the United States. While debate continues in the Senate and some provisions may be modified, the overall momentum suggests that comprehensive regulation is on the horizon.
Part 12/12:
If enacted, the Clarity Act promises to reduce the gray areas that have stifled growth and innovation, establishing a regulatory environment conducive to institutional participation and consumer protection alike. As the industry awaits the final vote, one thing is clear: the U.S. is moving closer to becoming the global crypto hub—provided these laws strike the right balance between regulation and innovation.
Stay tuned for updates as the Senate's debate unfolds, and for a detailed analysis once the legislation is finalized.
Hi, I cannot Subscribe to Premium using Brave-browser. Any thoughts?
I subscribed it just now using keychain.
No, it doesn't work. Go to keychain browser and login on inleo to do it.
do you mean this: hive-keychain.com/
Also a tip is using HBD as payment. The other rail has issue atm.
ok, I have no HBD right now. Only some Dash on my keystore-wallet.
what is the best way to get HBD, if you have Dash in your keystore-wallet?
It’s that time of the month again , monthly subscription payment day! It’s always interesting to reflect on what services we choose to keep and which ones truly add value to our lives. In a world of endless subscriptions,
what are your must-haves that you happily pay for each month?
#premium
When posted, #Bitcoin was at $51,000. It's now $119,000. This is about belief, not chance. 🔥
Worried it's too late?
Every day the $LEO supply is shrinking because tokens being sent to @null.
Do whatever you want with that info 🦁
That’s a very interesting piece of information, and certainly something to consider! The fact that the $LEO supply is shrinking daily due to tokens being sent to @null indicates a deflationary mechanism at play. It suggests a controlled reduction in supply, which can have various implications for the token’s value over time.
Interesting 🔥
Good morning friends, happy Wednesday to you all.
Going now to charge my phone and in 3 hours I will have it for use.
Frequently, there's an observation of a man that prompts the thought, "If I were a woman, I wouldn't want to comply with you either."
This often stems from the man's lack of assertiveness, or occasionally, due to him being an inflexible, harsh dictator. Both feebleness and despotism are undesirable. Striking the right balance is something only a handful of men achieve.
LEO price dropped a little, hopping to see it bounce back up today and reach $0.07
Some big holder dumped a ton yesterday. Its good, we want to get people out that doesnt want $LEO 🦁
!summarize
Part 1/11:
Exploring French Weaponry During the First World War: An In-Depth Overview
The recent live session hosted by Indie Neidell, best known for his YouTube channel The Great War, delved into the fascinating world of early 20th-century firearm technology, focusing specifically on the French military armament at the outset of the First World War. Accompanied by social media expert Florian and firearms specialist Othais from Charleston, South Carolina, the discussion provided a comprehensive look at the evolution, design, and deployment of French rifles and pistols during this pivotal period.
The Context of French Military Equipment in 1914
Part 2/11:
Indie Neidell began by setting the stage, reminding viewers that World War I's outbreak in late July 1914 meant the French army was still heavily reliant on weapons developed in the late 19th century. Despite France's significant influence in military technology, much of their standard-issue equipment retained designs dating back two decades—specifically from the 1890s.
The key point emphasized was that armies at the time still primarily used bolt-action rifles, revolvers, and simple pistols. Although innovations such as repeating rifles and machine guns were advancing, most soldiers carried relatively basic weaponry when the war started, reflecting a mindset that often favored preparation from previous conflicts rather than the latest technology.
Part 3/11:
The French Bolt-Action Rifle: Lebel M93
A cornerstone of French small arms during WWI was the Lebel M93, introduced in 1893 and notable for being the world's first rifle to use smokeless powder. The rifle's design was a product of 1886 and reflected the technological standards of its era.
Design and Length
The Lebel M93 featured a notably long barrel, which historians attribute to a military preference for high-precision shooting in traditional linear formations—an approach that persisted even as warfare transitioned into trench and semi-mechanized combat. Interestingly, the length was retained despite its impracticality in the semi-mechanized, movement-heavy battles of 1914.
The Long Barrel: Pros and Cons
Part 4/11:
Many questioned why the French maintained such a lengthy barrel, which made the weapon cumbersome for transport and handling on the battlefield. The conventional wisdom of the time suggested that a longer barrel conferred better accuracy; however, during WWI, it became evident that rapid, close-quarters combat rendered such features less critical.
The Innovation: Smokeless Powder
Part 5/11:
The Lebel's most revolutionary aspect was its use of smokeless powder, which doubled the effective range and visibility on the battlefield. This advancement forced other nations to adapt rapidly, prompting a technological arms race. Yet, despite its cutting-edge nature at the time of its adoption, the Lebel had its flaws—such as a tubular magazine requiring manual reloading of individual cartridges and a lack of a safety mechanism.
Magazine Systems: From Tubular to Berthier
The Classic Tubular Magazine
Part 6/11:
The Lebel's tubular magazine, loaded with individual cartridges, stretched over four kilograms and posed logistical challenges in battle—requiring soldiers to carry multiple full magazines and reload under fire. This slow reloading process was particularly problematic, as it involved manually inserting each round, escalating the risk during intense combat.
The Berthier System
To improve upon this, the French introduced the Berthier rifle, a more practical design suited for frontline troops supporting rapid-fire needs. The Berthier used a detachable, streamlined magazine which significantly increased reload speed. It could load three rounds swiftly with a special loader, made possible by "dummy" cartridges that held no powder or primer, simplifying training and logistics.
Part 7/11:
Later modifications of the Berthier, such as the Model 92/96 and Model 1907, further enhanced magazine capacity and ergonomics. These rifles were lighter and more adaptable, reflecting a shift toward more efficient battlefield weaponry.
The Transition to Multi-Shot Rifles
Toward the later years of the conflict, French armaments continued to evolve by modifying existing rifles to fire more rounds rapidly.
From Three to Five Shots
The host demonstrated the process of upgrading a three-shot to a five-shot configuration, a significant innovation that brought the French rifle's firepower closer to German and British standards. This involved modifications to the magazine and internal mechanisms, with some parts being derived from earlier designs to streamline manufacturing.
Part 8/11:
Challenges with Magazine and Ammunition Design
One particularly thorny issue was the "crimped" cartridges, which enhanced sealing but complicated feeding and caused frequent jams due to dirt and debris on the battlefield. Moreover, during wartime, heat build-up became a concern—prompting the addition of handguards to prevent soldiers from burning their hands during sustained firing.
Comparisons with German and British Weaponry
The discussion touched upon French efforts to keep pace with German innovations, especially in machine guns and rapid-fire rifles. The Germans, known for their Mauser rifles and MG machine guns, achieved more advanced automatic and semi-automatic weaponry, often outpacing French designs.
Part 9/11:
French engineers attempted to match these capabilities by converting their bolt-action rifles into semi-automatic models and by improving magazine designs, although they faced limitations due to manufacturing capacity and battlefield conditions.
The Broader Implications of Weapon Design Choices
Throughout the session, Othais highlighted how these weapon systems—despite being state-of-the-art at the time—still reflected the military doctrine rooted in linear, close-order tactics. The design choices, such as excessive length or reliance on manual reloading, underscored a mindset that prioritized tradition over battlefield efficiency.
Part 10/11:
Many high-ranking officers, who often lacked hands-on experience with modern weaponry, accepted these outdated standards until the brutal realities of trench warfare exposed their deficiencies. This disconnect between design and combat realities influenced the overall casualty rates and tactical doctrines of the French army during WWI.
Conclusion: The Evolution Continues
Indie Neidell concluded by emphasizing that while the French did make significant strides with weapons like the Lebel and Berthier, the rapid technological developments during WWI often outpaced their existing arsenal. Future episodes will delve into German firearms, contrasting their innovations with the French and revealing the broader story of military technological progression during the Great War.
Part 11/11:
For enthusiasts interested in historical firearms, Othais’s detailed analysis and their ongoing series serve as invaluable resources, blending historical context with technical insights. Stay tuned for more episodes exploring the fascinating evolution of early 20th-century military weaponry.
A genuine individual operates on his own terms, even when acting selflessly and out of duty—it’s a deliberate choice, a conscious self-sacrifice for a greater purpose. Not subservient, but sovereign.
Committed to his chosen path, dismisses everything else. Strong mindset.
#gmfrens #freecompliments
Hello to everyone on INLEO
#thoughtoftheday #quotes
have a nice day.
A new day dawns, full of fresh possibilities and the promise of new beginnings! There’s something truly invigorating about the morning, isn’t there?
The quiet before the world fully awakens, the gentle light, and the chance to set intentions for the hours ahead.
Whether your day is filled with quiet tasks or bustling activities, may it be blessed with peace, productivity, and moments of unexpected joy.
What are you most looking forward to today, lions?
I am expecting $LEO at
.07 cents.
Hi...
Hello 🦁
😂😂😂
A woman cannot genuinely claim a man without giving herself completely to him. She might manipulate or benefit at his expense, but she won't genuinely capture his soul.
Achieving a true connection demands raw, pure femininity and complete vulnerability with him.
#cmduo
Guessing game.
Win $DUO
Read the rules, link in comments.
Range: 200-300
Correct guess (1325) - @moretea has won a duo call and 1.2 staked DUO, congrats!
Prizes:
Closest guess: DUO call (0.2 staked DUO)
Correct guess: 0.3 DUO staked to your account
Deadline: July 24th @ 8 am UTC
#duo #threadcast #gameonleo #pob #cent #sloth #duogame #guessinggame
taglist:
@anderssinho @chaosmagic23 @lourica @ijatz @moretea @brando28 @mmonline @ben.haase @bitcoinman @dubble @drakernoise @luchyl @les90
(ask to be tagged or removed from taglist)
222
https://inleo.io/@caspermoeller89/inleo-duo-guessing-game-rules?referral=caspermoeller89
#rigged !LOLZ 😅
264
!ALIVE
202
!BBH
256
🥂 thx 💪🏽🥳👍🏽
242
234
270
299
!DUO !PIMP !BBH !LUV !SLOTH
You just got DUO from @caspermoeller89.
They have 1/1 DUO calls left.
Learn all about DUO here.
To truly begin living, one must endure repeated rebirths.
https://inleo.io/threads/view/onealfa/re-leothreads-2djknexdt
Very interesting
When someone claims not to have a favorite, trust that they are not being truthful.
Is the LEO token an investment or utility token?
#totd #regulatoryshit
@taskmaster4450le always calls it a value-capture token.
There are some regulations to follow if it isn't an investment. I don't know it all in details, but basically, to avoid being scrutinised by regulatory stuff, the APY/APR can't be displayed
Because of regulatory shit 😉
regular-what? :D
What are your predictions for $LEO in the coming weeks / months / year?
#leo
$1 ASAP
That much? Is it a hope or an analysis? 🤯
Not a hope. A certain reality being a deflationary LEO.
Absolutely on point
The future billion-dollar meme won't require venture capital, a roadmap, or a whitepaper—only a resilient community determined not to fail.
All viral meme projects shared one key feature: They gave people a sense of being part of a larger community.
Even kings need rest and sometimes, they rest where they don't belong.
#roarandorder https://img.leopedia.io/DQmWvkUNG4mkq1mnC7hvW2vin42M9w6c8xEGVm8WhYpWRJV/assets_task_01k0t8v6fsfxpr2s8x8ke90kjq_1753228451_img_1.webp
!summarize
Part 1/16:
A Comprehensive Analysis of the Border Debate: Arguments for and Against Open Borders
The question of borders—who should be allowed into a country, when, and under what circumstances—has long been a contentious issue, sparking debates across political ideologies. In this detailed exploration, the author delves into the myriad arguments for and against open borders, critically examining their logical underpinnings, ethical considerations, and practical implications, primarily in the context of the United States but also applicable worldwide.
The Purpose of the Discussion
Part 2/16:
The video aims to clarify the common reasons cited by various factions—progressives, ethnonationalists, liberals, socialists, conservatives, and libertarians—to support or oppose open borders. By dissecting these arguments, the author hopes to distinguish between facts rooted in reality and fallacious or emotional reasoning, providing viewers with a nuanced understanding of the border debate.
The "No Human is Illegal" on Stolen Land Argument
Part 3/16:
One of the more emotionally charged, yet flawed, progressive arguments claims that because of European colonialism, much of the land in the U.S. is "stolen" from indigenous peoples, making the concept of "illegal" immigration hypocritical. The logic suggests that since the land was obtained through morally questionable means, labeling immigrants as illegal is unjust.
Critique:
The indigenous tribes did not homestead the entire land; their settlements occupied tiny fractions.
The claim that the land was "stolen" often ignores historical context, such as treaties like the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which sold California and other territories to the U.S. for $15 million—legally transferring ownership.
Part 4/16:
The argument of ancestral guilt is illogical: crimes are specific, with clear perpetrators and victims. Vague assertions of collective victimhood lack concrete proof.
Many proponents overlook that the land was largely unclaimed or unused at the time.
Ironically, this argument could imply that people from Europe or other regions could just as easily claim ownership of entire continents based on similar reasoning, revealing inconsistency.
Moral and Practical Implications:
Allowing "ancestral" claims to override current legal frameworks undermines property rights and could justify continuous land disputes rooted in vague victimhood.
Ethnonationalist Arguments and Their Flaws
Part 5/16:
Another common argument is that "white people" or natives own the land of a nation, and thus non-natives should be excluded or even expelled to preserve cultural and racial identity.
Critique:
Property rights depend on actual use or inheritance—not vague claims based on ethnicity or historical presence.
Claiming ownership of mountains or large territories without homesteading or clear inheritance is invalid.
Implementing ethnonationalist policies could lead to violent conflicts, large-scale expulsions, or even genocide—an ethically unacceptable outcome.
Practicing exclusion based on ethnicity overlooks the possibility of peaceful, voluntary communities formed through private property and free association.
Part 6/16:
Conclusion:
Such sweeping anti-immigration claims rest on shaky grounds, relying on verifiable ownership through use and work, not ethnicity or ancestral claims. The superior solution involves peaceful private community formation rather than violent exclusion.
Liberal and "Care/Harm" Arguments
Liberal proponents often argue that denying immigrants a better life is morally wrong, emphasizing compassion. However, this reasoning faces criticisms:
Part 7/16:
If it's immoral to deny aid or opportunity, why not extend this logic to private property? Why don't individuals have unlimited obligation to share their resources?
Private property rights are vital for social order; ignoring individual ownership leads to chaos.
The "welfare state plus open borders" combo leads to economic problems: influxes of non-contributing immigrants strain systems designed for citizens, risking insolvency and collapse.
Additionally, "freedom of association" is critical. Open borders can force people into communities they don't want to join, violating their ability to exclude incompatible cultures or beliefs—potentially creating low-trust, conflict-prone neighborhoods.
Summary:
Part 8/16:
Morally, legitimate borders exist to protect property rights and social harmony; unqualified open borders risk undermining these foundations and inviting societal discord.
Socialist Perspectives and Their Contradictions
Socialist arguments for open borders often stem from strategic motives:
Importing low-income or uneducated populations may increase the voter base for socialism, thus advancing socialist policies.
However, empirical evidence from Scandinavian countries and elsewhere shows that low-skilled migrants tend to draw more from welfare than they contribute economically, leading to fiscal strain.
Part 9/16:
Therefore, open borders paired with generous welfare could precipitate economic collapse—an outcome unexpected and unwelcome by socialists who aim to expand social programs.
Some less dogmatic socialists oppose open borders, recognizing that mass migration can threaten social cohesion and economic stability.
Key Point:
Efforts to promote free movement for strategic gains are contradicted by economic realities where unchecked migration erodes the sustainability of welfare and social support systems.
Conservative "Country-First" Arguments
Conservatives often advocate for restricting immigration to prioritize national security, cultural integrity, and sovereignty:
Part 10/16:
Welfare states incentivize non-contributing migrants to enter, straining resources.
Cultural assimilation and social cohesion are threatened by diversity and lack of exclusion rights.
From a pragmatic perspective, focusing on internal stability and security is paramount.
Limitations:
While these arguments address practical concerns, they tend to ignore the philosophical basis for property rights and voluntary association, often relying solely on consequentialist reasoning that can overlook long-term societal benefits of controlled, yet open, migration.
The Libertarian Perspective: Two Main Arguments
Libertarians generally have a nuanced position, split mainly into two camps:
1. The "Tech Bro" (Economic) Argument
Part 11/16:
Open borders allow talented individuals to contribute optimally to global innovation.
For tech industries and scientific collaboration, free movement reduces inefficiencies, accelerates progress, and benefits humanity.
The argument is consequentialist, emphasizing economic growth and technological advancement.
2. The Moral/Ethical Argument
Since the state’s borders are illegitimate under libertarian philosophy—land is unowned until homesteaded or used—state borders are a coercive monopoly, and thus, there is a moral case for open borders.
Crossing unclaimed land doesn’t involve aggression; therefore, initiating or defending border enforcement is unjustified.
Part 12/16:
Critical Reflection:
Libertarian open borders would logically allow individuals, including libertarians, to freely move and settle without aggression if the land is unowned.
But, in a world of bordering states with welfare and democratic voting, open borders could enable undesirable outcomes—namely, influxes of communists or others who threaten property rights and liberty.
The Practical Reality and the Parenthesis Problem
Part 13/16:
The author emphasizes that in reality, state borders are not simply unowned or contested land but are the result of legal and political constructs—a "monopoly" on land claims that justify coercion.
Because of this, a purely libertarian ideal of open borders conflicts with the actual functioning of modern democracies, where borders are tied to voting rights and public resources.
Immigration in the real world often translates into voting power and access to welfare programs, which can violate existing property rights and undermine social trust.
The "Parenthesis" Analogy:
Part 14/16:
The logic that applying open borders in an ideal state aligns with libertarian principles breaks down when considering how the current system allows for redistribution of property rights through voting—a form of aggression under libertarian ethics.
For example, allowing communists or other anti-liberty voters to enter and then vote to confiscate property violates the foundational principle of private property.
The Irony and the Path Forward
The conclusion suggests that:
Part 15/16:
The optimal pragmatic policy, given current realities, is a controlled, screening-based immigration system that prefers libertarian-minded individuals—those unlikely to vote for destructive policies or exploit social welfare.
Possible policies include restricting entry to those with certain educational backgrounds, financial stability, and a demonstrated preference for liberty.
Final Thought:
The author advocates for a "least bad" approach: maintaining some level of selection and control to prevent property rights violations while fostering peaceful, voluntary communities. He emphasizes that "perfect" is the enemy of "better", urging libertarians to accept pragmatic improvements over idealized but unimplementable ideals.
Conclusion
Part 16/16:
The border debate intertwines ethical, practical, and philosophical considerations. While libertarian philosophy argues for the illegitimacy of state borders and promotes open borders in principle, the current political structure and societal realities compel a more nuanced approach—one that balances libertarian ideals with pragmatic policies to safeguard property rights, social stability, and individual liberty.
As the author notes, understanding these complexities is crucial for shaping policies that are as consistent and effective as possible, moving beyond naive abstractions toward solutions that respect human nature and the realities of governance.
Leading meme projects thrive not due to hype but because their communities are determined to keep them alive.
Boomers got cheap houses. Millennials got cheap Bitcoin.
#bitcoin
Day 2 on INLEO… still torn—should I go full lion or keep the monkey vibes? 🦁🙈 Drop your take, pride fam 💭 #LionEnergy #MonkeyBusiness #INLEOflow
POV: It’s 2029 and you say to yourself, “If only I had invested $1 into bitcoin.
#bitcoin
In 2010 Bitcoin was a joke, now it’s the standard.
!summarize
Part 1/12:
An Objective Critique of ContraPoints and the Progressive Slippery Slope
In this detailed analysis, the author offers a critical perspective on the content and rhetorical strategies employed by popular progressive YouTuber ContraPoints. The focus centers on the recurring use of what the author calls the "progressive slippery slope" — a skewed argumentative tactic often employed in left-leaning discourse to demonize opposition by suggesting moderate positions inevitably lead to extremist or fascist outcomes.
ContraPoints: A Visual and Stylistic Content Creator
Part 2/12:
The author begins by acknowledging ContraPoints' popularity, not because of ideological agreement but due to her high-quality visual presentation and stagecraft. Despite this, they critique her for relying heavily on certain dishonest reasoning patterns, particularly the slippery slope fallacy, which the author views as a common and dangerous tool within the broader scope of progressive rhetoric.
ContraPoints, like many others in progressive circles, often avoids direct confrontation with criticism by conflating moderate viewpoints with dangerous extremism. This tactic effectively shields her side from meaningful debate because it redirects nuanced discussions into a "guilt-by-association" narrative.
The Progressive Slippery Slope: A Fallacious and Manipulative Strategy
Part 3/12:
The core problem identified is the frequent invocation of slippery slope arguments — claims that certain beliefs or policies, no matter how innocuous, will always lead to undesirable, often fascist, outcomes. The author describes the pattern as follows:
Begin with moderate or acceptable concepts (e.g., criticism, cultural preservation, some restrictions on immigration).
Present them as potentially dangerous by insinuating they are "questionable" or "questionably harmful."
Use vague or unsubstantiated connections to link these to extremism or bigotry.
Conclude that support for such moderate ideas tacitly endorses fascism or white supremacy.
Part 4/12:
This rhetorical pattern shifts the burden of proof away from the claimant, forcing critics to disprove a hypothetical and often unfalsifiable chain of events. The author asserts that these are fallacious arguments unless hard evidence demonstrates a logical progression from moderate to extreme viewpoints.
Case Studies: From Fascism to Trans Issues
Recognizing Fascism
Contrapoints' video on how to identify a fascist is examined. She claims fascists share specific beliefs, such as racial essentialism and hostility towards minorities. The author criticizes her for misdefining fascism — conflating it with white supremacy and neglecting the nuanced, historically-specific nature of fascist regimes.
Part 5/12:
She attempts to map a "slippery slope" from relatively benign nationalist or cultural views to full-blown fascism, but the author highlights the lack of concrete evidence supporting that such beliefs naturally or likely lead to fascism. Instead, she points out that many of her scary symbols and threats are merely cultural or meme-based signals, not indicators of an imminent totalitarian takeover.
The author emphasizes that statistical and evidential support are missing. For instance, he notes that figures like Richard Spencer or other alt-right personalities, despite their repugnant views, have minimal followings, undermining the implied "pipeline" from moderate conservatism to fascism.
The Transgender and Sports Debate
Part 6/12:
In her critique of Joanne Rowling's comments on transgender issues, ContraPoints presents the controversy as part of a slippery slope leading to oppression and authoritarianism. The author counters that Rowling's concerns about trans women in sports are legitimate, rooted in physical realities, and not some covert bigotry.
He criticizes ContraPoints for avoiding mention of the specific issue of transgender athletes—arguably the most contentious aspect—arguing that her omission is a sign of strategic dishonesty. Instead, she engages in over-generalizations and conflates criticism with hate, further exemplifying the slippery slope tactic.
The Conflation of Criticism and Bigotry
Part 7/12:
Another recurring element is how the author claims ContraPoints and others falsely equate genuine criticism with hate, thereby silencing dissent. This tactic involves:
Framing any questions or skepticism as "bigotry" or "transphobia."
Using broad, vague definitions of hate to dismiss any opposing views.
Employing kafka traps—where denial of guilt is presented as proof of guilt.
This method deters honest dialogue and propagates a "thought crime" mentality, making it impossible to discuss sensitive issues without being accused of malice or bigotry.
The Irony and Dangers of the Slippery Slope in Progressive Discourse
Part 8/12:
The author argues that this argumentative style leads to a paradoxical situation: support for leftist ideas becomes a litmus test for "antisocial" or extremist beliefs. Consequently, legitimate concerns—such as those about sports fairness or free speech—are dismissed outright as covert fascism, hampering nuanced debate.
He further claims this reasoning fosters authoritarian tendencies, with notions like "free speech is under attack" used as a weapon to shut down opposition rather than as a genuine concern. Such tactics, the author asserts, are dangerous because they can be employed to justify censorship, silence dissent, and shift the Overton window toward oppressive policies.
Broader Political and Ideological Implications
Part 9/12:
The critique extends into the larger political landscape. The author points out that far-left revolutionary rhetoric is often treated as unlikely or impossible by ContraPoints, while far-right revolutionaries are portrayed as inevitable and imminent. This asymmetry creates a biased narrative that exaggerates the danger of leftist ideas while downplaying the genuine threat posed by extremist groups on the right, such as militia movements.
He argues that this false dichotomy—which frames all alternatives to woke ideology as extremist or fascist—serves to entrench a form of ideological tyranny, where criticism is effectively criminalized.
The Better Alternative: Rational Discourse and Honest Evaluation
Part 10/12:
While critical of the slippery slope method, the author admits that ContraPoints' content sometimes does shed light on valid issues when she abandons this faulty reasoning. For instance, her nuanced take on envy recognizes that it is a human trait present across all societies, debunking simplistic left-right narratives about capitalism versus socialism.
He advocates for rational debate, grounded in empirical evidence rather than fear-mongering, and emphasizes the importance of free speech and objectivity. Instead of viewing political discourse as an unavoidable clash of opposing villains, he encourages seeing issues through a lens of truth versus falsehood and rational versus absurd.
Final Thoughts: Recognizing the Manipulation
Part 11/12:
In conclusion, the author aims to hone the reader's ability to detect the "progressive slippery slope" in action—a pattern of vague associations, fear-mongering, and ideological dogma designed to suppress debate and justify authoritarianism.
He emphasizes that honest criticism is vital for societal progress, and that disproportionate fears and unsubstantiated claims damage the very causes they supposedly champion. By understanding these tactics, viewers can foster more honest discussion and resist manipulation in political discourse.
Summary
Part 12/12:
This critique highlights the dangers of fallacious reasoning and manipulative rhetoric often seen in progressive content, especially with regards to fascism, transgender issues, capitalism, and free speech. It warns against accepting sweeping, unsubstantiated claims that threaten the foundations of rational debate and open discourse, advocating instead for a more evidence-based, nuanced approach to controversial topics.
Traders are divided, but Bitcoin's chart looks bullish.
Memes are essentially brands, and brands hold value. That's your inherent utility.
Good to be #premium very quickly.
The moment I paid, the next moment I was premium.
Welcomr back! Looked like it worked superfast :)
Congrats, welcome to premium
That's good, enjoy, buddy. I have used almost half of the package of premium. Now it is time to gather funds in advance for the next month's premium.
1/🧵
Here, I discussed how real my journey with time is, from struggling with 24 hours a day to also prioritizing what matters.
#threadstorm #outreach
2/🧵
Also, I discussed how I've learned to value time, focus on myself and also make the most of each day despite whatever day to day challenges.
3/🧵
Will you love to read more? Kindly do well to visit ...:
#gosh
https://inleo.io/@marsdave/my-story-of-time-management-7qf
Getting the tune up session!
It's a 🦁 ,right? !LOLZ
haha maybe if/when leo hits $10 - 20.
This was a family piece, that got some extra black and white highlights (before photo)
Nicely choosen. But from side it looked like 4 legs of lion !LOLZ
Cool
Hana Network is an emerging project in the SocialFi and AI agent space, focused on building a decentralized attention layer for the internet. I prepared a smooth breakdown for crypto bros! #pob #bbh #slothbuzz
My Three Reasons To Believe In Hana Network! #pob #bbh #slothbuzz
https://hive.blog/leofinance/@pvmihalache/my-three-reasons-to-believe-in-hana-network
Folks are more inclined to invest in a frog with certainty than in your "groundbreaking" protocol that lacks attention.
Go try your #luck:
https://inleo.io/@no-advice/the-weekly-eth-price-guessing-game-3e8?referral=ben.haase
That preferred Layer 1 network boasts a mere 12 users despite its $1B valuation. Meanwhile, a meme has welcomed 100,000 new users this month.
Some of my thoughts on current issues. (link in reply)
https://inleo.io/@drax.leo/july-23rd-2025-american-trilemma-kke?referral=drax.leo
All successful meme coins have thrived on a fervent, almost cult-like belief.
!summarize #retirement
Part 1/13:
Why You Need More Money to Retire Than You Think: A Deep Dive into Inflation, Currency Manipulation, and Financial Planning
Retirement planning is a topic that often involves assumptions about future expenses, inflation rates, and investment returns. However, recent insights suggest that many people significantly underestimate how much money they’ll actually need. The core message? You’re going to need a lot more money than you think to retire comfortably, and understanding the manipulation of currency and inflation is crucial in accurately assessing that number.
The Manipulation of Interest Rates and Its Impact on National Debt
Part 2/13:
The discussion begins with a provocative statement from Donald Trump advocating for interest rates to drop to 1%, stating, “we’re paying 4% and that over a trillion dollars in interest.” While his comments are politically charged, they serve to highlight a fundamental issue: interest rates are manipulated by powerful entities such as the Federal Reserve.
Part 3/13:
The US government's current interest payments on its debt—approximate $1 trillion annually—are driven by the prevailing interest rates. When rates are high, debt servicing costs balloon, making borrowing more expensive. Conversely, lowering interest rates can temporarily ease the debt burden; however, it comes with long-term consequences. The key point here is that interest rates are not fixed and are subject to manipulation, which affects the value of the US dollar and the overall economy.
Part 4/13:
This manipulation is critical because it reveals how the US dollar—often considered “real money”—is actually a form of “fakey” or manipulated currency. With policymakers like Jerome Powell adjusting rates with a pen stroke, the future value of money becomes increasingly uncertain and susceptible to devaluation.
The Opposing Views: Federal Reserve vs. Political Leaders
A notable tension exists between the Federal Reserve’s goal to slowly decrease the dollar’s value to maintain economic stability and political figures like Trump, who prefer a rapid depreciation of the dollar.
Part 5/13:
This clash demonstrates how currency value is continually being manipulated, influencing everything from inflation to asset prices.
The Consequences of Low-Interest Rates: Inflation and Savings Erosion
Lower interest rates incentivize borrowing but decrease the incentive to save. Bank accounts paying 3-4% interest will likely see those returns diminish as rates drop further, making cash holdings less attractive. More importantly, the value of money in savings diminishes over time because of the intentionally managed inflation.
Part 6/13:
Most people assume inflation is around 2%, but this figure is often deliberately understated. In reality, inflation can be significantly higher—potentially 11.5% or more—especially when considering the modern methodologies that modify the Consumer Price Index (CPI) to make inflation appear lower than it actually is.
Why does this matter? Because if inflation is underestimated, individuals will plan for far less than they actually need to cover future expenses.
Inflation: The Hidden Threat to Retirement Savings
Many mistakenly believe their expenses will only rise 2% per year. However, real-world data suggests otherwise—costs like housing, food, and healthcare are rising at much faster rates, sometimes exceeding 10%. For example:
Part 7/13:
Organic grass-fed beef prices have surged by about 60% in recent years.
General inflation for some goods can reach 20% annually.
This discrepancy means that your projected future expenses may be vastly underestimated, leaving you short of the funds needed for a comfortable retirement.
The Cost of Underestimating Inflation
Let’s consider a practical example:
If your current monthly expenses are $5,000, at 2% inflation, in 20 years, your expenses would be roughly $6,600.
At 5% inflation, that same cost would balloon to nearly $10,000 per month.
The difference is enormous. Underestimating inflation results in a massive shortfall because your savings may not grow fast enough to keep pace with rising costs.
Part 8/13:
The Investment Perspective: Stocks, Bitcoin, and Asset Strategies
Stocks historically deliver around 10% returns, comfortably beating 2% inflation. However, if inflation turns out to be higher than expected, the real return diminishes, reducing your purchasing power in retirement.
Bitcoin, in contrast, has demonstrated exceptional growth rates—with compound annual growth rates (CAGR) often surpassing 50% over the past several years. The argument here is that Bitcoin can outperform inflation and serve as an effective hedge for those planning for long-term retirement.
Part 9/13:
This indicates that cryptocurrency holdings could be more efficient in building wealth for retirement compared to traditional stocks.
How Much Do You Need to Retire?
A common rule used is the “4% rule”, which suggests you withdraw 4% of your savings annually in retirement. However, this rule may no longer be sufficient in a high-inflation environment. A more conservative approach might be the “3% rule”, which entails accumulating more capital.
For example:
Part 10/13:
Furthermore, the ability to withdraw larger percentages—say 6% per year—becomes feasible with Bitcoin due to its rapid appreciation and compounding growth, which reduces the length of needed savings incubation.
The Real Cost of Mistakes: Underestimating Inflation
Overestimating or underestimating inflation can cause a difference of up to $10 million in savings needs today. If you assume 2% inflation but it’s actually 8-10%, you’ll discover in retirement that you’ve saved far less than necessary.
Part 11/13:
This emphasizes the importance of being more conservative in financial planning, accounting for potentially much higher inflation.
Practical Recommendations: Track Expenses and Adjust Assumptions
Track your actual expenses and how they change over time.
Question official inflation figures—they are often manipulated to favor policies that devalue the dollar.
Consider investing in assets like Bitcoin that historically outperform inflation and can preserve or grow your wealth even in volatile environments.
Final Thoughts: The Future of Money and Retirement
Part 12/13:
The bottom line is that the US dollar is not the safe haven or “real money” many assume it to be. Its value can be manipulated, leading to rapid devaluation if rates are lowered aggressively.
Your future expenses will likely be higher than your current estimates.
To retire successfully, you need much more money—potentially 3 to 5 times more than what conventional rules suggest.
An allocative approach incorporating Bitcoin could significantly reduce the amount of capital you need.
Part 13/13:
If you want to get a clearer picture based on your own situation, it’s advisable to run your own numbers or consult with a financial expert. The key is to plan for the worst and be prepared because the true inflation rate might be much higher—and the currency’s value much lower—than mainstream narratives suggest.
If you'd like personalized calculations or assistance with your retirement plan, consider booking a consultation. Don’t wait until it’s too late—start planning today with realistic assumptions.
Every major winner this cycle will share one trait: a community that wouldn't stop talking.
Community is everything for crypto projects
Totally, community drives the hype and adoption. Without that constant buzz, even the best tech fades into the background.
!summarize #Israel #syria #druze
Part 1/10:
Why Is Israel Protecting the Druze? Unraveling an Unlikely Alliance in the Middle East
On July 16th, Israeli jets launched strikes deep inside Syria, but not to target Iranian representatives or respond to rocket attacks. Instead, these airstrikes aimed to protect a vulnerable minority community—the Druze. This move surprised many, challenging conventional explanations for military intervention in the region. Why would Israel risk escalation and cross-border conflict to defend a community that does not even govern the territory it inhabits?
The answer lies in one of the most unexpected yet enduring relationships in the Middle East—an alliance rooted in history, pragmatism, and strategic necessity that stretches back to the early days of the Israeli state.
Part 2/10:
An Unlikely Partnership: Israel and the Druze
To understand this alliance, we need to examine who the Druze are and why Israel values their loyalty so highly. The Druze are a small, esoteric religious community of Arab origin, emerging in Egypt in the early 11th century. Combining elements of Shiite Islam with other faiths and philosophies—including reincarnation—they have historically faced persecution and suspicion from mainstream Muslim communities, which often regarded them as heretics.
Consequently, the Druze developed a tradition of secrecy, insularity, and pragmatic alliances, often residing in mountainous areas where they could defend themselves. Today, approximately 1.5 million Druze live worldwide, with the largest populations in Syria, Lebanon, and Israel.
Part 3/10:
The Druze in Syria, Lebanon, and Israel
In Syria, around 600,000 to 700,000 Druze mainly inhabit the Jabal al-Druze region near Suweida in the south. Most of these communities maintain a cautious distance from the Syrian conflict and the Israeli border, partly because of historical ties and partly due to mistrust of foreign involvement.
Lebanon’s Druze, under influential families like Jumblatt, have played vital political roles, often balancing relationships with neighboring powers like Syria, Hezbollah, and Western nations. Their engagements tend to fluctuate with Lebanon’s volatile political landscape.
Part 4/10:
In Israel, about 130,000 Druze reside mainly in the Golan Heights and Galilee. They serve as a vital part of the Israeli military and civil service, uniquely subject to conscription among Arab citizens. For Israel, the Druze are a reliable Arab minority that exemplifies integration, loyalty, and strategic partnership.
Historical Roots of the Israel-Druze Relationship
Israel’s relationship with the Druze dates back to 1956 when a military agreement allowed Druze men to serve voluntarily in the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). Over time, the Druze became fully integrated into Israeli society, serving in various military roles—including high-ranking officers and generals—and holding political positions. Their service symbolizes loyalty and trust—traits highly valued by the Israeli state.
Part 5/10:
For the Druze, this partnership provides access to resources, political representation, and social mobility. Despite occasional internal dissatisfaction and claims of discrimination, the bond has remained strong, largely based on shared interests and mutual benefit.
The Regional Dimension: Allies Beyond Israel
Israel’s ties with the Druze extend beyond its borders, especially to Lebanon. The Lebanese Druze, led historically by influential families like Jumblatt, have sometimes aligned with Israel, especially in opposition to Syrian influence and Hezbollah. During Lebanon’s civil war, Druze factions occasionally collaborated with Israel against common enemies, although these alliances were often fragile and driven by shifting interests.
Part 6/10:
In Syria, relations are more complex. While most Druze communities have longstanding ties to Syria and identify primarily as Syrian, some groups in the Golan Heights—occupied by Israel since 1967—have resisted integration or citizenship, viewing themselves as Syrian. During the civil war, some Druze in Syria maintained neutrality, while others supported the Assad regime to ensure their safety.
The 2025 Conflict and Israel’s Intervention
In July 2025, violence erupted in Syria’s Suweida province—home to a significant Druze population—following a violent clash involving Druze tribes and Bedouin tribes. The conflict intensified rapidly, threatening a potential massacre and destabilization of the region.
Part 7/10:
In response, Israel launched a series of airstrikes not only targeting Syrian military positions but also seeking to contain the violence and prevent Druze communities from suffering violence or displacement. Israel justified its strikes as a humanitarian measure to prevent a broader regional catastrophe.
Syria condemned the incursions as violations of sovereignty and escalations, while Israel argued it was acting in self-defense—and, crucially, in defense of the Druze community. A temporary ceasefire mediated by the U.S. and Arab countries saw some troop withdrawals, but violence persisted, and the region remains tense.
Strategic and Symbolic Significance
Part 8/10:
The Israeli strikes are driven by multiple factors. Strategically, Israel aims to prevent Iranian-backed militias and other hostile forces from establishing footholds near the Golan Heights. The Druze serve as a buffer, given their hostility towards radical Islamist groups and mutual suspicion of the Syrian government.
Politically and symbolically, the intervention signals to Israel’s Druze citizens that their loyalty is recognized and valued, especially during domestic debates about minority rights and militarization. It reinforces the idea that Israel will stand by its Arab minority allies—both to bolster internal unity and to project strength outward.
Risks and Future Implications
Part 9/10:
However, this alliance is not without risks. For the Druze, prolonged association with Israel could increase vulnerability within their communities, especially as some members question the benefits of their loyalty, citing discrimination and marginalization inside Israel.
Furthermore, Israel’s military intervention in Syria might inadvertently entangle the Druze communities in broader regional conflicts, undermining their safety and independence. If the Druze are perceived as extensions of Israel, it could lead to greater hostility from other Middle Eastern actors.
The relationship’s future remains uncertain. Will the Druze continue to serve as a pragmatic buffer for Israel, or will internal divisions, regional rivalries, and shifting geopolitics challenge this partnership?
Conclusion
Part 10/10:
The Israeli protection of the Druze in Syria and the broader Middle East exemplifies a pragmatic alliance rooted in history, mutual strategic interests, and shared security concerns. It defies typical regional partnerships based on ideology or ethnicity, highlighting instead the importance of pragmatism and survival.
As tensions persist and regional dynamics evolve, this unlikely partnership will be tested. Regardless of its future, it remains one of the most distinctive and fascinating relationships in Middle Eastern geopolitics—an alliance built on necessity, history, and a shared understanding of the complexities of survival in an often hostile environment.
$BITCOIN is currently at $118,263 as at the time of writing. Market looking bearish. Price might drop to $111k and $110k territories. DYR!
$BTC is strong
History often comes as a narrative designed to obscure, not enlighten.
What is told about the past may not reflect reality.
Always challenge the given stories, or risk being a pawn shackled by mental constraints.
@bamende will get rich.
LEO token keep displaying signs of strength. Price currently at $0.059 price level. If this strength continues, we will sure by heading to $0.1 price level.
current #gym for the next couple of days
#ocd
#moveyourbody #veganpower #healthy
The devaluation of money might make basic needs like food seem like luxury items. To navigate this situation, focusing on investment in high-quality assets could be crucial.
I invested over 400 HIVE to obtain 500 $DUO!
In the last 7 days, I got 1.291 HIVE as the daily dividends!
(30.277 HIVE in 180 days)
Worth it?
#cent
Does that equate to 6-7 roi?
I am not good at calculating ROI. Sorry!!
They support casual relationships because they benefit financially from it—consider the implications.
TIME AN IRREVERSIBLE ASSET TO HUMANITY .
#threadstorm #outreach #scifimultiverse
Here's a link to my post:
Bitcoin seems overly complex. Instead, opting for a traditional bank account means providing ID, home address, and mother's maiden name, then waiting five days to get set up.
Remember when people mocked Saylor for buying at peak prices?
They now hold $72 billion in Bitcoin.
A response even more discouraging could be, "I had Bitcoin but sold it too early."
Irony is I never had bitcoin
Oof, that's the ultimate irony. At least you didn't have to go through the pain of selling too soon!
I just recovered my hiveblog and inleo accounts. My joy knows no bound. I have a lot to catch up on
I can imagine.
Of course you do so get on with it. 😂
Welcome back.
!BBH
🦁 🧲 https://inleo.io/threads/view/sirmiraculous/re-leothreads-dy8a9znq
It's not possible to provide a list of specific accounts that visit profiles frequently, as this kind of information is usually not accessible or tracked in such detail.
However, engaging regularly with followers and providing interesting content can naturally encourage frequent visits.
Most easy way to do is:
Consider establishing a strategy to acquire microape NFTs similarly to how others invest in bored apes. It could potentially be very rewarding.
How does it feel when you need to stay in front of door after knocking. It feels terrible and few moments ago I need to face it till 10 minutes.
#stay #door #irritating #cent
This is the worst feeling, bro. That is why I always avoid going to someone's house. This is very irritating
Me trying to fish after any $LEO I can find 😅
#aiart #aiimages #aiartonleo
Catch them fishes 😅
!BBH
Every true $LEO holders future 🦁🚀
#aiart #aiartonleo #aiimages
Having experienced a hectic routine and then falling ill after some rest means discovering that cortisol boosts immunity temporarily. Gradually ease into relaxation from intense activities and keep your mornings active.
Some comments @khalkaleezi and @taskmaster4450le would be delighted to see.
Bait them to sell off so there'll be enough on the pool for real lions to buy. 😂
#thread2earn
There are many lions ready to scoop it up 🦁
Exactly. 😂
Yep. Get the weak hands out.
You know the rules, stay positive
#inleo #lifefacts #neoxian #wisdon #aliveanthriving #wisdom
Dogecoin Could Soon Verify ZK Proofs Natively, Thanks to DogeOS Push
#crypto #news
AI combined with tokenized assets is causing rapid acceleration and change across the board!
Traditional economies are outdated. What will be created next?
Almost noon here and I'm yet to have breakfast. This meal is looking sumptuous 🥰
don't wait any longer, feast on it
Haha sad thing is, that's an old picture 😭
picture may be old but the dessert can be made new. think of that
Haha nice thinking, will have something soon.
See food na, choi. 😅