Exploring the Complexities of Surrogacy: A Personal Thought.
Hello, readers. One thing I love about the #hivelearners community is that they give everyone the chance to talk about their personal opinion on different topics, and with this, we tend to see how broad the human mind works.
On today's episode of Writing on Learners, we are to discuss a very sensitive topic: "Surrogacy." You might ask, what it means; in simple terms, it means
An arrangement where a woman (the surrogate) agrees to carry and give birth to a child for another person or couple (the intended parents), who will then raise the child. There are two main types: gestational surrogacy, where the surrogate carries a pregnancy created with the intended parents' (or donor) eggs and sperm, and traditional surrogacy, where the surrogate uses her own egg.
Personally, I have mixed feelings about surrogacy. On one hand, I understand that it can be a wonderful way for individuals or couples who are unable to have children on their own to fulfill their dreams of becoming parents. Not everyone would love to adopt when science has proven a way people can have children with their own genetic features. The selflessness and generosity of the surrogate in carrying a child for someone else is truly remarkable.
People who think about doing it, I mean, helping other women carry their child in their womb, are strong women. While I was doing my research before writing on this topic, I was made to understand that there are two ways or types of surrogacy.
- Gestational Surrogacy: This is when the surrogate carries the pregnancy, but the baby is not genetically related to her. That is, the egg and sperm used in creating the baby will come from the real parents after the child has started growing in something called IVF.
One thing I am concerned about is that the research said the child will not be related to her, but the blood the embryo used in developing into a child was from the surrogacy, so how is the child not related to her? Anyways, I have nothing to say about that because I know very little.
The other type is
- Traditional Surrogacy: This type is when the carrier uses her own egg while the sperm for fertilization comes from the man. In simple terms, the surrogacy and the intended father are both having a child. (No sexual intercourse; it is done by injecting the man's sperm into the surrogate.)
However, I also have concerns about the potential risks and challenges that can arise in a surrogacy arrangement. Issues such as exploitation of the surrogate, lack of legal protection for all parties involved, and the emotional toll it can take on everyone are all important factors to consider.
What if the surrogate decided to keep the child for herself? The parent can sue her for kidnapping. There is always this emotional bond between a mother and her child, I was just thinking. Is surrogacy a job where people carry a child for nine months, then give the child away after getting an agreed amount of money?
Morally, it doesn't sit well with me, but if this means a parent can have a child, what can I say against that?
In terms of ethics, I believe that as long as the surrogacy arrangement is done willingly and with full consent from all parties involved, it can be ethical. Transparency, communication, and legal protections are key in ensuring that the rights and well-being of everyone are respected throughout the process.
Can I allow surrogacy in my marriage?
The truth is that I am not against the idea of bearing children like this, but I would like my child to get everything she or he needs from my wife and me. I know people who are faced with childbearing issues also don't wish to have their children this way, which means I also don't wish to have my child this way.
The traditional way a husband and wife make children themselves is still the best, and I hope people continue to make children like that.
Thanks for reading. My name is Fashtioluwa.
@fashtioluwa this a great write up and I must commend the hive learners. Regarding your question about the genetic connection in gestational surrogacy, the reason the child is not considered biologically related to the surrogate is that genetics are determined by DNA, which comes solely from the egg and sperm used in IVF. The surrogate provides the environment for the baby to grow, but her genetic material does not influence the child’s DNA.
Then your concerns about the emotional and legal aspects of surrogacy are valid. Surrogacy laws vary across countries, and ensuring that all parties are legally protected is crucial. Emotional bonds between the surrogate and the baby can also be complex, which is why thorough counseling and agreements are important in the process before anything 😏😏😏
Whaoo
You seems to have more vast knowledge concerning this topic and the DNA part you explain, it shade more light on it
Thanks for this wonderful comment
I did learn something new from it.
Not as if I have much knowledge but I happened to be a victim where it happened
😳😳😳
Explain further 🫴🫴
I know you want to know bro
You will pay for the knowledge 😜😂😜😂😜😂😜
😂😂😂😂
You have catch me
Sending Love and Ecency Curation Vote!
Please Vote for our New Proposal! 🙏
Thank you so much 😊
You're welcome! :)
Lolz, I love your idea of allowing your child to get whatever he or she needs from you and your wife. Surrogacy can be a lot of trouble in some cases
Yeah
It can but if it’s a way for people to have their children, I think it’s a great idea
That's rught
Let me clear some of your doubts....
#1. Surrogacy has to be done willingly or else it has become human trafficking.
#2. Surrogacy has legal backings to cover those risks you mentioned in your post. For an instance, the surrogate medical fees will be taken care of till some months after birthing the baby.
#3. For gestational surrogacy, it is the father's genes that generate most of the child's blood in the womb. The mother contributes only a safe haven and a feeding route for the baby.
This is why an HIV positive mother who married an HIV negative man can give birth to a baby that is HIV negative as well because her blood is not involved per se.
Lastly, surrogacy is a good idea especially when it is properly done. I have read about couples who name their surrogates as God mothers to the baby so that the bond formed would not be lost.
I feel that this is way better than having illegitimate children scattered everywhere like some men do.
Whaooo
A lot of you know so much about this topic and I’m just beginning to explore it.
I love this.
You’re so knowledgeable, I learnt so much from what you just said . This is amazing
Awwwn , thanks bro. I'm still learning as well 😁
Thank you 😊 ❤️
Is probably a very good thing and a really selfless act. But at the same time, if I'm not crucified, I will probably raise the question of the feasibility of this process in many cultures around the world. Of course, feasibility aside, that is a very good thing and a lot of couples who can't have a child for different reasons can have them. But those ethical and moral bounds of this process can actually render it unthinkable in many places on Earth, don't you think?
Yeah, I think so and I understand your point
In my culture, it would be better the man marries another woman and get the child in the old traditional way than having another woman carry the child of the couple.
Remember the act is a good act that helps a couple get their own child but like you said many culture might stand against it
Yes, probably traditional marriage is a better solution. It really is a debatable topic. But I think people neglect adopting orphans a lot. That is also a straightforward sedation to a straightforward problem.