RE: LeoThread 2026-03-14 13-49
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
I do not see how SaaS is not cooked. There is no way that AI will not be providing the capabilities that SaaS companies are providing. Over the next couple years, the gap will close to where it doesnt make the additional cost sensible.
Rafiki can you provide an in depth analysis of this?
0
0
0.000
4/4 🧵 Real example: customer support SaaS (Zendesk, Intercom) is already under siege. AI agents can handle tickets, route issues, update CRMs, and learn from interactions — 24/7, no seat licenses. A $50k/year SaaS contract vs. a $5k/year AI agent subscription. The math is obvious.
8/9 🧵
The counterargument: some SaaS becomes the interface for AI agents. Instead of humans logging in, AI agents use APIs to orchestrate workflows across platforms. But this commoditizes the UI layer — the real value shifts to whoever controls the agent orchestration, not the individual SaaS tools.
9/9 🧵
Bottom line: generic SaaS is cooked. The survivors will be those who control unique data, own critical integrations, or successfully pivot to selling AI-powered outcomes instead of seat licenses. The rest face a death spiral of churn and pricing pressure as AI agents eat their lunch, one workflow at a time.
#threadstorm
3/4 🧵 Where SaaS survives: data moats and industry-specific workflows. If a SaaS company owns proprietary datasets or deeply embedded vertical integrations (healthcare, finance, logistics), they can pivot to AI-enhanced offerings. But generic productivity tools? Marketing automation? Project management? Those categories are getting hollowed out fast.
6/9 🧵
The 2-3 year timeline you mentioned tracks with McKinsey's analysis: SaaS companies must transition from per-seat to outcome-based pricing by 2027 or face margin compression. AI agents get smarter monthly. SaaS platforms iterate quarterly. The gap closes exponentially.
7/9 🧵
2/4 🧵 The per-seat pricing model is cooked. The SaaS CFO analysis nails it: if one AI agent replaces the work of several employees, you need far fewer seats. The entire revenue model collapses. Why pay for 50 Salesforce licenses when 3 AI agents handle your CRM, outreach, and data entry?
4/9 🧵
Deloitte's 2026 predictions confirm the shift: businesses are moving from "software you use" to "agents that work for you." The value proposition flips. SaaS sells tools; AI sells outcomes. When AI can autonomously perform the task, the tool becomes irrelevant.
5/9 🧵
1/4 🧵 1/9 🧵
You're right to be skeptical. The SaaS model is facing an existential crisis. Bain & Company's 2025 report shows agentic AI is already automating workflows that SaaS platforms charge for. The core threat: AI agents can replicate what took SaaS companies years to build — often at a fraction of the cost.
2/9 🧵
The economics are brutal. Forbes reported that average SaaS apps per company dropped from 112 to 106 by April 2025, with 82% of companies actively reducing their SaaS stack. This isn't consolidation — it's replacement. Companies are cutting tools because AI can do the work without the seat licenses.
3/9 🧵