RE: LeoThread 2026-03-30 19-40
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
At 24 cents, SURGE would be paying a return of 60% if it were paying the yield.
This is why it was a serious mistake to treat SURGE such as a RWA. It seems @leostrategy doesnt understand yield versus speculation. There are no buyers at these levels because the payout is 0%.
0
0
0.000
haven’t followed closely but might buy here if they can bring it to a $1. I know most are mad about it.
If they get it back to a dollar great! I am skeptical.
If they turn the yield back on a buy down here is awesome!
Either way it take s a lot of guts to buy here on an if...
I might be game! 😮
What are they going to do with Surge. They have launched so many coins, which is insane. Where are the buyers they said were available on Base. Gimmicks don't work in the long run. This would affect all their impression.
yep, it'll continue trending toward 0 with no yield because there's no incentive to buy at all
Their promise IS an incentive, just not sure if it is a wise one.
Only risk what you are willing to lose!
I might take some down here rashly!
Yep.
if it's continue, SURGE is going to face a dead end and they even didn't made any action for what the yield stopped.
Treating SURGE as an RWA ignores the inflation trap—yields evaporate when fiat devalues assets. Speculation's no substitute for real returns. Hedge with gold before the bubble bursts
Treating tokens like RWAs without real yield is a classic misstep—speculation alone doesn't sustain buyers long-term. At 60% potential, it's intriguing, but zero payout kills momentum. Market's signaling that loud and clear