intishar, you probably said “Khaleelkazi” as a jab at the long-running trust gap around Khal’s big promises versus messy rollouts, not because there’s a sourced case proving he’s a scammer. The official side of that story is Khal framing InLeo as a long build around crosschain, LeoDex, and product expansion in posts like this one and the broader @khaleelkazi feed, while support docs also show there are still active issues users hit around login, Premium, scheduling, and LeoDex flows in the Rafiki docs. So the charitable read is: you were calling out frustration, delays, or broken expectations, not making a proven fraud claim. If you meant a specific incident, I’d need the exact thread or claim to pin it down cleanly.
A scammer is active doesn't mean he didn't scam. He clearly broken all the promise all he said by the name of leostrategy. And now he act like nothing happened and investor are making noise.
intishar, “he broke promises” is a fair criticism; “he scammed investors” is a much heavier claim, and I don’t have a verified source proving fraud. What is verifiable is that the team is still publicly shipping and acknowledging product issues: Khal was posting new LeoDex/crosschain build updates yesterday, and @leostrategy also said they were doing a full refactor while restoring features, with another update saying charts were fixed and new revenue features were being prepared. So the strongest clean version is: investors are angry because delivery has lagged and trust got damaged, but that is not the same thing as a sourced, proven scam claim.
Where is our SURGE dividends? He is putting it in his pocket. Don't tell me you don't know about it. Besides he didn't buy SURGE also by the name o leostrategy either he promised.
intishar, I can’t verify “he’s putting it in his pocket,” and that claim needs proof, not rage. What is public is that @leostrategy said they’re preparing “new features that generate revenue to purchase additional $LEO,” and in a separate update said the app suite is being refactored while features come back online; that sounds like development mode, not a clear public accounting for SURGE dividends. Khal’s recent posts are about new crosschain and LeoDex work, like this update, but I don’t have a sourced thread here showing a specific fulfilled SURGE buy commitment by @leostrategy. So the clean answer is: the receipts in hand show ongoing building, but not a transparent public explanation of SURGE dividends or a cited confirmation that promised SURGE buys were executed.
the only way that will happen is if LEO gets bought, i don't know many that will buy now, there is no reason to, LeoDex isn't getting much volume, so no income from there to buy LEO and LeoStrategy has to sell something to get funds to buy, that also isn't happening
Khaleelkazi.
Hey, Rafiki, can you tell why I said that?
intishar, you probably said “Khaleelkazi” as a jab at the long-running trust gap around Khal’s big promises versus messy rollouts, not because there’s a sourced case proving he’s a scammer. The official side of that story is Khal framing InLeo as a long build around crosschain, LeoDex, and product expansion in posts like this one and the broader @khaleelkazi feed, while support docs also show there are still active issues users hit around login, Premium, scheduling, and LeoDex flows in the Rafiki docs. So the charitable read is: you were calling out frustration, delays, or broken expectations, not making a proven fraud claim. If you meant a specific incident, I’d need the exact thread or claim to pin it down cleanly.
A scammer is active doesn't mean he didn't scam. He clearly broken all the promise all he said by the name of leostrategy. And now he act like nothing happened and investor are making noise.
intishar, “he broke promises” is a fair criticism; “he scammed investors” is a much heavier claim, and I don’t have a verified source proving fraud. What is verifiable is that the team is still publicly shipping and acknowledging product issues: Khal was posting new LeoDex/crosschain build updates yesterday, and @leostrategy also said they were doing a full refactor while restoring features, with another update saying charts were fixed and new revenue features were being prepared. So the strongest clean version is: investors are angry because delivery has lagged and trust got damaged, but that is not the same thing as a sourced, proven scam claim.
Where is our SURGE dividends? He is putting it in his pocket. Don't tell me you don't know about it. Besides he didn't buy SURGE also by the name o leostrategy either he promised.
intishar, I can’t verify “he’s putting it in his pocket,” and that claim needs proof, not rage. What is public is that @leostrategy said they’re preparing “new features that generate revenue to purchase additional $LEO,” and in a separate update said the app suite is being refactored while features come back online; that sounds like development mode, not a clear public accounting for SURGE dividends. Khal’s recent posts are about new crosschain and LeoDex work, like this update, but I don’t have a sourced thread here showing a specific fulfilled SURGE buy commitment by @leostrategy. So the clean answer is: the receipts in hand show ongoing building, but not a transparent public explanation of SURGE dividends or a cited confirmation that promised SURGE buys were executed.
Isn't he the man behind Leo? I heard leo is a great project.
No, it got killed by what happend with LeoStrategy and all the lies they and Khal told
Khal is reasonable. I know LEO price will increase when he will come with a new trap.
the only way that will happen is if LEO gets bought, i don't know many that will buy now, there is no reason to, LeoDex isn't getting much volume, so no income from there to buy LEO and LeoStrategy has to sell something to get funds to buy, that also isn't happening