RE: LeoThread 2025-02-06 03:08

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

Looking for any and all #feedback on our new Stats page!



0
0
0.000
33 comments
avatar

mad respect for this one. put it all on chain. there's no denying the stats now.

0
0
0.000
avatar

According to those stats, Khal should be be reimbursing the 1st DHF Proposal.

0
0
0.000
avatar

based on?

0
0
0.000
avatar

Based on not hitting 10k MAUs using the original definition Khal gave in the original proposal.

0
0
0.000
avatar

i don't remember specifics but the data clearly shows there were 10k users added

0
0
0.000
avatar

Yes thank you ser! I agree

We’re working on a way to actually download the raw data too (it’s a 1GB file)

Full transparency!

0
0
0.000
avatar

After reading what some of the critics have been saying, shouldn't you be listing those who are active but not posting, posting just on threads, show it monthly not bimonthly and doing better to justify your claimed stats?

0
0
0.000
avatar

These stats are monthly

We don’t list users who are not active, we list users who have made some kind of action on the UI

This is actually in response to the critics because our 13k MAUs figure includes users who lurk (vote, read, share links, etc.)

Most of our critics seem to forget 99% of social media is lurking

That being said, we took that into consideration and did “Monthly Active Creators” so there can be no refuting these stats

0
0
0.000
avatar

Right, so show all that activity. I agree with them that you got creative to make your quota, so you didn't feel a need to reimburse the DHF. A vote a month or votes at all shouldn't count, since we have autovoters. I see votes from users who haven't been here in 5 years.

0
0
0.000
avatar

1). We did not get creative with our quota. We brought over 10k monthly active users and that means people who use the platform
2). our numbers never included any auto voters
3). On traditional social media, more than 90% of users are consumers: they read, bookmark, like and otherwise engage with content
4). This was never a surprise way we measured things. We always measured INLEO by monthly active users which = consumers + creators. The time to refute our use of data like this was early on, not at the end

The way we got to 13,500+ was through users who did any action on our interface which includes bookmarking content, manually liking content (autovoters are easy to exclude and we did so), sharing content via the link share menu, etc.

There are many more actions than just commenting, threading or blogging. IMO certain people are forgetting the broader market and that MOST people consume without creating

1/2

0
0
0.000
avatar

I may add a consumer section to this dashboard too just to highlight how this works. It’s important that we use the same KPIs as traditional social media

thank you for this feedback. I do like seeing the other side perspective. If you have any more, I am open ears

2/2

0
0
0.000
avatar

There you go and can you unmute me on your frontend?

0
0
0.000
avatar

I’m replying to you from INLEO, you’re not muted as far as I can see

0
0
0.000
avatar

Interesting, because they don't appear on my side and haven't for months. After commenting or posting they show up and disappear with a reload

0
0
0.000
avatar

Oh, you are showing an image of your notifications. They show all notifs from all frontends, which is why. I do not show up on your threads on the inleo frontend. scroll through it without using the notif link

0
0
0.000
avatar

You do realize that there are many users who only post threads with unoriginal quotes and mist hivers will not consider those users as adding value, so shouldn't be counted. Those are essentially spam accounts

0
0
0.000
avatar

Also, you promised detailed reports every month explaining where every cent went and the gains from them that never happened either. You should definitely reimburse the original Proposal.

0
0
0.000
avatar

my #feedback:

  1. Awesome! I love this kind of information - helps for visualizing the added value of the platform for the ecosystem.
  2. Less is more with regards to MACs - I feel just the last sentence would be sufficient "users who made .. on the INLEO UI."
  3. Maybe write MACs as Monthly Active Creators (to be consistent with Hive Power).
  4. Collaborations - opportunity to also post the link to the proposal.

!lolz !duo !pimp !diy

0
0
0.000
avatar
@rainbowdash4l just sent you a DIY token as a little appreciation for your comment dear @khaleelkazi! Feel free to multiply it by sending someone else !DIY in a comment :) You can do that x times a day depending on your balance so:

Don't be shy - share some DIY!

You can query your personal balance by !DIYSTATS

0
0
0.000
avatar

I actually really like this. It's great for helping people make fundamental decisions about investing in the project, kind of like an active 10K. I was confused on the name and thought it was my stats, but once I was there I figured it out.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Looks pretty cool, interesting stats, can see colab numbers like Dash

0
0
0.000