RE: LeoThread 2026-04-22 21-57

avatar

You are viewing a single comment's thread:

My thoughts on @leostrategy (in short):

  • Too many RWAs launched too fast (buyers exhausted)
  • RWA tokenomics was flawed to begin with: backed by LEO instead of being backed 1:1 with real TSLA, NVDA, GOLD

1/2

leofinance
0
0
0.000
9 comments
avatar
  • No demand left for ACE
  • Still, LeoStrategy kept pushing new products, Predict & Perps, which clearly aren't production ready, missing a lot of features.

2/2

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

Spot on with the tokenomics flaw—pegging to LEO dilutes the "real asset" appeal when buyers crave direct exposure to TSLA/NVDA/GOLD volatility. RWA fatigue is real; overlaunching erodes trust in the space

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

What's the way forward for the investors now

0
0
0.000
Reply
avatar

It's very hard to say at this point. Tbh, I haven't seen many projects recover from this stage, but I guess there is always hope if they come up with a recovery plan. Still, silence is bothering and that they are unknown...

0
0
0.000
Reply