RE: LeoThread 2026-01-30 16-08
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Part 4/11:
Her accusations extended further, claiming that NIST’s refusal to analyze the collapse openly and their subsequent denial of her RFC demonstrated dishonesty. The agency admitted they did not analyze the actual process of the towers’ destruction, thus blatantly neglecting their statutory mandate.
The Physics and Evidence Contradictions
Dr. Wood’s critiques hinge on her observations that the destruction of the WTC towers defies conventional physics. She argued that the pulverization of steel and other debris occurred far too rapidly and extensively to be explained by fire and gravitational collapse alone. Remarkably, photographs and physical evidence show steel beams turned to dust before reaching the ground, with no plausible explanation consistent with hot fires or kinetic energy.